Literature DB >> 16212456

Computed tomography versus color duplex ultrasound for surveillance of abdominal aortic stent-grafts.

Ali F AbuRahma1, Christine A Welch, Bandy B Mullins, Benjamin Dyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the ability of computed tomography (CT) and color duplex ultrasound (CDUS) to detect endoleak and accurately measure aortic aneurysm diameters after endovascular repair.
METHODS: Between February 2000 and October 2004, 178 consecutive patients (156 men; mean age 74 years, range 49-89) were treated with aortic stent-grafts (86 Ancure, 55 AneuRx, and 37 Excluder). The follow-up protocol included serial CT and CDUS at 1 month and every 6 months thereafter. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Kappa statistics (kappa) were calculated using CT as the gold standard; Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the 95% limits of agreement. Paired and unpaired t tests and correlation coefficients were used to compare the methods.
RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 1 to 53 months (mean 16), during which 367 paired CT and CDUS studies were acquired. The mean diameter of the AAA sac after repair was 5.15 cm by CT versus 4.99 cm by CDUS (p=0.07); 93% of paired studies were somewhat similar (<or=5 mm). Mean pre to postoperative AAA size changes throughout follow-up were -0.60 mm for CT versus -0.58 mm for CDUS (p=0.78). Thirty-four (19%) endoleaks were detected (26 early and 8 late). Versus CT, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CDUS for detecting endoleaks were 68%, 99%, 85%, and 97%, respectively (kappa=0.73). CDUS was more accurate in detecting type I endoleak than type II (88% versus 50%, p=0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: Although CDUS has good correlation to CT in measuring the size of AAAs, it has a lower sensitivity in detecting endoleak, particularly type II. Therefore, CT scans should remain the primary imaging modality for the diagnosis of endoleak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16212456     DOI: 10.1583/05-1575MR.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current status of the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Linda J Wang; Anand M Prabhakar; Christopher J Kwolek
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

Review 2.  Duplex Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Where Do We Stand Now?

Authors:  Evridiki Karanikola; Ilias Dalainas; Georgios Karaolanis; Georgios Zografos; Konstantinos Filis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-09

Review 3.  Ultrasonography for endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Maria Laura Luchetta; Rita De Florio; Francesco Cozzolino; Giovanni Casazza; Piergiorgio Duca; Basso Parente; Massimiliano Orso; Antonella Germani; Paolo Eusebi; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-09

4.  Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

5.  Imaging Surveillance following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Anand Shah; S William Stavropoulos
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm follow-up by shear wave elasticity imaging after endovascular repair in a canine model.

Authors:  Antony Bertrand-Grenier; Sophie Lerouge; An Tang; Eli Salloum; Eric Therasse; Claude Kauffmann; Hélène Héon; Igor Salazkin; Guy Cloutier; Gilles Soulez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Angiotensin II Infusion Does Not Cause Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Rats.

Authors:  Evan H Phillips; Mandy S Chang; Sydney Gorman; Hamna J Qureshi; Karin F K Ejendal; Tamara L Kinzer-Ursem; A Nicole Blaize; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 1.934

Review 8.  Diagnostic imaging methods applied in long-term surveillance after EVAR. Will computed tomography angiography be replaced by other methods?

Authors:  Karolina Stefaniak; Michal Stanisic; Marcin Gabriel; Grzegorz Oszkinis
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 1.426

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.