Veronica Y Womack1, Hongyan Ning2, Cora E Lewis3, Eric B Loucks4, Eli Puterman5, Jared Reis6, Juned Siddique2, Barbara Sternfeld7, Linda Van Horn2, Mercedes R Carnethon2. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. veronica.womack@northwestern.edu. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 5. Psychiatry Department, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 6. Division of Prevention and Population Sciences, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 7. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify psychosocial factors associated with sedentary behavior, we tested whether perceived discrimination is associated with sedentary behavior. METHODS: Black and white men and women (N = 3270) from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study reported experiences of discrimination and time engaged in total and screen time sedentary behaviors in 2010-11. RESULTS: There were no associations of discriminatory experiences with total sedentary behavior time. However, discriminatory experiences were positively associated with screen time for black men (OR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.86) and white women (OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.00) after adjusting for demographic and traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors. CONCLUSION: Among black men and white women, discriminatory experiences were correlated with more screen time sedentary behavior.
OBJECTIVE: To identify psychosocial factors associated with sedentary behavior, we tested whether perceived discrimination is associated with sedentary behavior. METHODS: Black and white men and women (N = 3270) from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study reported experiences of discrimination and time engaged in total and screen time sedentary behaviors in 2010-11. RESULTS: There were no associations of discriminatory experiences with total sedentary behavior time. However, discriminatory experiences were positively associated with screen time for black men (OR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.86) and white women (OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.00) after adjusting for demographic and traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors. CONCLUSION: Among black men and white women, discriminatory experiences were correlated with more screen time sedentary behavior.
Authors: Luisa N Borrell; Catarina I Kiefe; David R Williams; Ana V Diez-Roux; Penny Gordon-Larsen Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Carolyn C Voorhees; David Murray; Greg Welk; Amanda Birnbaum; Kurt M Ribisl; Carolyn C Johnson; Karin Allor Pfeiffer; Brit Saksvig; Jared B Jobe Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2005 Mar-Apr
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Clarence C Gravlee; David R Williams; Barbara A Israel; Graciela Mentz; Zachary Rowe Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Elliott M Blass; Daniel R Anderson; Heather L Kirkorian; Tiffany A Pempek; Iris Price; Melanie F Koleini Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2006-07-05
Authors: David M Cykert; Joni S Williams; Rebekah J Walker; Kimberly S Davis; Leonard E Egede Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Aprill Z Dawson; Rebekah J Walker; Jennifer A Campbell; Leonard E Egede Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Kosuke Tamura; Stephanie L Orstad; Ellen K Cromley; Sam J Neally; Sophie E Claudel; Marcus R Andrews; Joniqua Ceasar; Mario Sims; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2021-02-20
Authors: Samuel L Swift; M Maria Glymour; Tali Elfassy; Cora Lewis; Catarina I Kiefe; Stephen Sidney; Sebastian Calonico; Daniel Feaster; Zinzi Bailey; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 3.752