Literature DB >> 16210679

Considerations in recruiting underscreened women to focus groups on screening for cervical cancer.

Katherine M Wilson1, Carlyn E Orians.   

Abstract

This article describes recruitment activities and costs from two independently conducted studies that used similar, systematic approaches to recruiting two subgroups of underscreened women, Black women and Mexican women. The studies varied in number of recruiters, venues of recruitment, and region of the country. The ratio of women approached to women who were underscreened was 4:1 for Black women and 10:1 for Mexican women. Hysterectomy was a predominant reason for ineligibility among Black women but not Mexican women. In both studies, personal networks were the most productive method of identifying women. Flyers and organized community venues were least productive. The cost incurred for identifying a woman who was eligible for a focus group was 145 dollars for Black women and 59 dollars for Mexican women. Those planning research or program activities that include recruiting underscreened women either to focus groups or health services could benefit from this information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16210679     DOI: 10.1177/1524839905278755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  6 in total

1.  Strategies for Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Amongst First Nations Communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Marion Maar; Pamela Wakewich; Brianne Wood; Alberto Severini; Julian Little; Ann N Burchell; Gina Ogilvie; Ingeborg Zehbe
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2014-11-24

2.  The utility of non-proportional quota sampling for recruiting at-risk women for microbicide research.

Authors:  Kathleen M Morrow; Sara Vargas; Rochelle K Rosen; Anna L Christensen; Liz Salomon; Lawrence Shulman; Candelaria Barroso; Joseph L Fava
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2007-02-27

3.  Exploring disparities and variability in perceptions and self-reported colorectal cancer screening among three ethnic subgroups of U. S. Blacks.

Authors:  Clement K Gwede; Claire M William; Kamilah B Thomas; Will L Tarver; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Jongphil Kim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Beliefs of women's risk as research subjects: a four-city study examining differences by sex and by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Stefanie L Russell; Ralph V Katz; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Cristina Claudio; Krassimira Tzvetkova
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  AMIGAS: a multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women.

Authors:  Theresa L Byrd; Katherine M Wilson; Judith Lee Smith; Gloria Coronado; Sally W Vernon; Maria Eugenia Fernandez-Esquer; Beti Thompson; Melchor Ortiz; David Lairson; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  AMIGAS: building a cervical cancer screening intervention for public health practice.

Authors:  Judith Lee Smith; Katherine M Wilson; Carlyn E Orians; Theresa L Byrd
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.681

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.