Literature DB >> 16209701

Treatment of infections with ESBL-producing organisms: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

D Andes1, W A Craig.   

Abstract

Susceptibility surveillance investigations have demonstrated an increased incidence of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacilli. Case cohort studies have suggested clinical relevance associated with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaciae infection. Yet, current laboratory reporting guidelines classify a large percentage of these organisms in the susceptible category. The regulatory agencies Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (formly NCCLS) and EUCAST, which oversee these guidelines are in the process of re-evaluating the appropriateness of the current classification system. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies examine the relationship between drug exposure (pharmacokinetics), antibiotic potency (MIC), and treatment efficacy. PK/PD studies and analyses have been useful in demonstrating the relevance of increasingly less susceptible pathogens and specific emerging resistance mechanisms. Recent investigations have examined the impact of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacilli relative to advanced generation cephalosporin pharmacokinetics. Animal model studies suggest that the pharmacodynamic target associated with efficacy in treatment of ESBL-producing organisms is the same as that in therapy against non-ESBL-producing bacteria (50% T>MIC). Simulation of human pharmacokinetics can predict the likelihood of achieving this PD target with specific cephalosporin dosing regimens. In general, the exposure from usual regimens of the advanced generation cephalosporins would not be anticipated to achieve the PD target for many of the organisms currently classified as susceptible. PK/PD analyses should be useful in re-evaluating current susceptibility breakpoints for ESBL-producing organisms and for optimising drug and regimen choice in treatment of these infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16209701     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01265.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  36 in total

1.  Activities of ceftazidime and avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Ken Coleman; Premavathy Levasseur; Anne-Marie Girard; Monica Borgonovi; Christine Miossec; Henri Merdjan; George Drusano; David Shlaes; Wright W Nichols
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A Systematic Approach to the Selection of the Appropriate Avibactam Concentration for Use with Ceftazidime in Broth Microdilution Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Patricia A Bradford; Michael D Huband; Gregory G Stone
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Predictors of mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: importance of inadequate initial antimicrobial treatment.

Authors:  Mario Tumbarello; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Eva Montuori; Enrico M Trecarichi; Brunella Posteraro; Barbara Fiori; Rita Citton; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Giovanni Fadda; Roberto Cauda; Teresa Spanu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints.

Authors:  John Turnidge; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by use of semiautomated microbiology systems and manual detection procedures.

Authors:  Irith Wiegand; Heinrich K Geiss; Dietrich Mack; Enno Stürenburg; Harald Seifert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Treatment of extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase enterobacteriaceae with cefepime: the dose matters, too.

Authors:  Jerry Altshuler; Samuel L Aitken; David Guervil; Diana Esaian; John Papadopoulos; Cesar A Arias
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  A long journey from minimum inhibitory concentration testing to clinically predictive breakpoints: deterministic and probabilistic approaches in deriving breakpoints.

Authors:  A Dalhoff; P G Ambrose; J W Mouton
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Expert systems in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Trevor Winstanley; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Strategies to reduce curative antibiotic therapy in intensive care units (adult and paediatric).

Authors:  Cédric Bretonnière; Marc Leone; Christophe Milési; Bernard Allaouchiche; Laurence Armand-Lefevre; Olivier Baldesi; Lila Bouadma; Dominique Decré; Samy Figueiredo; Rémy Gauzit; Benoît Guery; Nicolas Joram; Boris Jung; Sigismond Lasocki; Alain Lepape; Fabrice Lesage; Olivier Pajot; François Philippart; Bertrand Souweine; Pierre Tattevin; Jean-François Timsit; Renaud Vialet; Jean Ralph Zahar; Benoît Misset; Jean-Pierre Bedos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae testing susceptible to cefepime by reference methods.

Authors:  Renata C Picão; Ronald N Jones; Rodrigo E Mendes; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.