C R Seed1, P Kiely, A J Keller. 1. Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. cseed@arcbs.redcross.org.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The risk of transfusion transmitted viral infection is now so low that mathematical modelling is required to estimate the residual risk. The first national viral risk estimates for hepatitis B virus (HBV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) were recently published by the Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Using several refinements to the original methodology, as well as an additional 2 years of data, new risk estimates have been derived. METHODS: Viral screening data for Australian donors for 2000/2003 were retrospectively analysed. The data were applied to three published models to estimate the residual risk of transmitting HIV, HBV, HCV or human T lymphotrophic virus (HTLV) by blood transfusion in Australia. RESULTS: Applying the three models to HBV, HIV and HCV, three point estimates of the residual risk per unit were calculated for each virus. The median point estimates were 1 in 1,339,000 for HBV, 1 in 1 in 7,299,000 for HIV, and 1 in 3,636,000 for HCV. Although the HTLV risk could not be equivalently calculated because of the lack of incident infection it was estimated to be considerably less than 1 in 1,000,000 using a separate method. CONCLUSIONS: The most current and accurate estimate of residual risk of viral transmission in Australia has been provided in the present study. The residual risk in Australia is exceptionally small, continuing to decrease and is generally less than European or US risk estimates. These new estimates demonstrate that for viral transmission the Australian blood supply is amongst the safest in the world, and provide a basis for evaluating the cost benefit of future viral testing methodologies.
BACKGROUND: The risk of transfusion transmitted viral infection is now so low that mathematical modelling is required to estimate the residual risk. The first national viral risk estimates for hepatitis B virus (HBV), humanimmunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) were recently published by the Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Using several refinements to the original methodology, as well as an additional 2 years of data, new risk estimates have been derived. METHODS: Viral screening data for Australian donors for 2000/2003 were retrospectively analysed. The data were applied to three published models to estimate the residual risk of transmitting HIV, HBV, HCV or human T lymphotrophic virus (HTLV) by blood transfusion in Australia. RESULTS: Applying the three models to HBV, HIV and HCV, three point estimates of the residual risk per unit were calculated for each virus. The median point estimates were 1 in 1,339,000 for HBV, 1 in 1 in 7,299,000 for HIV, and 1 in 3,636,000 for HCV. Although the HTLV risk could not be equivalently calculated because of the lack of incident infection it was estimated to be considerably less than 1 in 1,000,000 using a separate method. CONCLUSIONS: The most current and accurate estimate of residual risk of viral transmission in Australia has been provided in the present study. The residual risk in Australia is exceptionally small, continuing to decrease and is generally less than European or US risk estimates. These new estimates demonstrate that for viral transmission the Australian blood supply is amongst the safest in the world, and provide a basis for evaluating the cost benefit of future viral testing methodologies.
Authors: Ester C Sabino; Thelma T Gonçalez; Anna Bárbara Carneiro-Proietti; Moussa Sarr; João Eduardo Ferreira; Divaldo A Sampaio; Nanci A Salles; David J Wright; Brian Custer; Michael Busch Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Lacey Johnson; Ryan Hyland; Shereen Tan; Frank Tolksdorf; Chryslain Sumian; Axel Seltsam; Denese Marks Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Denise Utsch Gonçalves; Fernando Augusto Proietti; João Gabriel Ramos Ribas; Marcelo Grossi Araújo; Sônia Regina Pinheiro; Antônio Carlos Guedes; Anna Bárbara F Carneiro-Proietti Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Peijie Hou; Joshua M Tebbs; Dewei Wang; Christopher S McMahan; Christopher R Bilder Journal: Biostatistics Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 5.899