Literature DB >> 16205784

Differential regulation of the consummatory, motivational and anticipatory aspects of feeding behavior by dopaminergic and opioidergic drugs.

Maria Flavia Barbano1, Martine Cador.   

Abstract

Various aspects of feeding behavior (eg consumption, motivation and anticipation) are regulated by homeostatic and hedonic systems, and are modulated by dopaminergic and opioid brain systems. Here, we have studied the modulation of these aspects of feeding behavior by opioid and dopaminergic neurotransmission while taking into account food palatability and homeostatic state. Foods that varied in palatability were presented to either food sated or food restricted rats following injections of different doses of naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, or flupenthixol, a dopaminergic receptor antagonist, in behavioral paradigms that measured different aspects of feeding. Naloxone decreased food intake in a dose-dependent manner in sated rats given access to palatable food, without modifying food intake in food restricted rats. Flupenthixol did not have any effect on food intake. With regard to motivation, which was tested in a straight alley, naloxone increased the latency to reach the food only in sated rats presented with palatable food. Flupenthixol did not modify the latency of any group. Conditioned locomotor activity to repeated food presentation, a measure of anticipation, is expressed only in food restricted rats. Naloxone did not modify anticipatory activity, whereas flupenthixol decreased it only in food restricted rats presented with palatable food. These results reinforce the idea that the opioid system regulates feeding through the modulation of the perceived palatability of food. The dopaminergic system seems to be more important for the regulation of anticipatory activity related to motivationally relevant stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16205784     DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  44 in total

Review 1.  Translational Assessment of Reward and Motivational Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Andre Der-Avakian; Samuel A Barnes; Athina Markou; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

Review 2.  Opioids for hedonic experience and dopamine to get ready for it.

Authors:  M Flavia Barbano; Martine Cador
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Discrete neurochemical coding of distinguishable motivational processes: insights from nucleus accumbens control of feeding.

Authors:  Brian A Baldo; Ann E Kelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; A Farrar; S M Mingote
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2006.

Authors:  Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Forebrain circuitry involved in effort-related choice: Injections of the GABAA agonist muscimol into ventral pallidum alter response allocation in food-seeking behavior.

Authors:  A M Farrar; L Font; M Pereira; S Mingote; J G Bunce; J J Chrobak; J D Salamone
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  Galanin: a potential role in mesolimbic dopamine-mediated instrumental behavior.

Authors:  John K Robinson; Ariel Brewer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Selection of sucrose concentration depends on the effort required to obtain it: studies using tetrabenazine, D1, D2, and D3 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Marta Pardo; Laura López-Cruz; Noemí San Miguel; John D Salamone; Mercè Correa
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Hemodynamic and behavioral differences after administration of meloxicam, buprenorphine, or tramadol as analgesics for telemeter implantation in mice.

Authors:  Matthew T Rätsep; Valerie F Barrette; Andrew Winterborn; Michael A Adams; B Anne Croy
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism reverses the effects of dopamine receptor antagonism on instrumental output and effort-related choice in the rat: implications for studies of psychomotor slowing.

Authors:  Andrew M Farrar; Mariana Pereira; Francisco Velasco; Jörg Hockemeyer; Christa E Müller; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.