Literature DB >> 24041211

Hemodynamic and behavioral differences after administration of meloxicam, buprenorphine, or tramadol as analgesics for telemeter implantation in mice.

Matthew T Rätsep1, Valerie F Barrette, Andrew Winterborn, Michael A Adams, B Anne Croy.   

Abstract

Cannulation of the common carotid artery for chronic, continuous radiotelemetric recording of aortic hemodynamic properties in mice is a highly invasive recovery surgery. Radiotelemetric recording, by its continuous nature, gives the most accurate measurements of hemodynamic variables in experimental animals, and is widely used in the study of cardiovascular diseases including hypertension. The American Heart Association has recommended data acquisition by radiotelemetric recording but did not provide guidelines regarding postoperative analgesic support. We assessed hemodynamic parameters, locomotor activity, food intake, and weight loss in radiotransmitter-implanted CD1 female mice receiving analgesic support during the first 48 h after surgery. The efficacy of analgesic support from the NSAID meloxicam was compared with that of the widely used opioid agonist buprenorphine and the related compound, tramadol. Meloxicam-treated mice recovered lost body weight more rapidly than did tramadol-or buprenorphine-treated mice. Furthermore, meloxicam-treated mice maintained circadian rhythm after surgery and had tighter regulation of mean arterial pressure than did tramadol- or buprenorphine-treated mice. Meloxicam was also superior with regard to food intake, locomotor activity, and limiting variance in hemodynamic parameters. This study indicates that when compared with buprenorphine and tramadol, meloxicam should be the postoperative analgesic of choice for radiotelemeter implantation in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041211      PMCID: PMC3784661     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  46 in total

1.  Effects of food intake and oxidative stress on intestinal lesions caused by meloxicam and piroxicam in rats.

Authors:  I Villegas; C Alarcón de la Lastra; C La Casa; V Motilva; M J Martín
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 4.432

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy causes less sleep disturbance than open abdominal surgery.

Authors:  I Gögenur; S Rosenberg-Adamsen; C Kiil; M Kjaersgaard; H Kehlet; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in animals and the relevance to humans.

Authors:  U Busch; J Schmid; G Heinzel; H Schmaus; J Baierl; C Huber; W Roth
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.922

4.  Gastrointestinal safety profile of meloxicam: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  P Schoenfeld
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1999-12-13       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  An evaluation of analgesic regimens for abdominal surgery in mice.

Authors:  K E Hayes; J A Raucci; N M Gades; L A Toth
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2000-11

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacology of tramadol.

Authors:  Stefan Grond; Armin Sablotzki
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Respiratory depression and spinal opioids.

Authors:  R C Etches; A N Sandler; M D Daley
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Biotelemetry transmitter implantation in rodents: impact on growth and circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Lisa R Leon; Larry D Walker; David A DuBose; Lou A Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Risk of serious upper gastrointestinal and cardiovascular thromboembolic complications with meloxicam.

Authors:  Gurkirpal Singh; Stephan Lanes; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  The assessment of post-vasectomy pain in mice using behaviour and the Mouse Grimace Scale.

Authors:  Matthew C Leach; Kristel Klaus; Amy L Miller; Maud Scotto di Perrotolo; Susana G Sotocinal; Paul A Flecknell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Analgesic Efficacy of Subcutaneous-Oral Dosage of Tramadol after Surgery in C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Rocio Evangelista-Vaz; Alessandra Bergadano; Margarete Arras; Paulin D Jirkof
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  Nalbuphine, a non-controlled opioid analgesic, and its potential use in research mice.

Authors:  Heather Lyons Narver
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 3.  Administration of meloxicam to improve the welfare of mice in research: a systematic review (2000 - 2020).

Authors:  Ana Tada Fonseca Brasil Antiorio; Jilma Alemán-Laporte; Ana Paula Pauloni de Freitas; Pedro Kenzo Yamamoto; Luciana Cintra; Claudia Madalena Cabrera Mori
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Heart Rate Variability Reveals Altered Autonomic Regulation in Response to Myocardial Infarction in Experimental Animals.

Authors:  Emanuele Pizzo; Silvia Berrettoni; Ridhima Kaul; Daniel O Cervantes; Valeria Di Stefano; Sudhir Jain; Jason T Jacobson; Marcello Rota
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  Using Cageside Measures to Evaluate Analgesic Efficacy in Mice (Mus musculus) after Surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa L Oliver; Sarah E Thurston; Jennifer L Lofgren
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Physiologic, Behavioral, and Histologic Responses to Various Euthanasia Methods in C57BL/6NTac Male Mice.

Authors:  Gregory P Boivin; Michael A Bottomley; Patricia A Schiml; Lori Goss; Nadja Grobe
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Clinical Management of Pain in Rodents.

Authors:  Patricia L Foley; Lon V Kendall; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 0.982

8.  Benefits of non-invasive methods compared to telemetry for distress analysis in a murine model of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Simone Kumstel; Praveen Vasudevan; Rupert Palme; Xianbin Zhang; Edgar Heinz Uwe Wendt; Robert David; Brigitte Vollmar; Dietmar Zechner
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 10.479

9.  Subcutaneous meloxicam suspension pharmacokinetics in mice and dose considerations for postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Patty H Chen; Kelli L Boyd; Erin K Fickle; Charles W Locuson
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 1.786

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.