Literature DB >> 16201852

Involvement of c-Jun N-terminal kinase in G2/M arrest and caspase-mediated apoptosis induced by sulforaphane in DU145 prostate cancer cells.

Sung-Dae Cho1, Guangxun Li, Hongbo Hu, Cheng Jiang, Kyung-Sun Kang, Yong-Soon Lee, Sung-Hoon Kim, Junxuan Lu.   

Abstract

Sulforaphane (SFN) is a major isothiocyanate compound in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, cauliflower, and Brussels sprouts. Preclinical animal models have recently shown that SFN and other isothiocyanates may be useful for prostrate cancer (PCa) chemoprevention. In this study we used a DU145 human PCa cell culture model to investigate the role of protein kinase signaling pathway(s) in SFN-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and whether another chemopreventive agent selenium enhances the apoptosis potency of SFN. The results showed that SFN exposure for 24 h or longer significantly decreased the number of viable DU145 cells in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50 of asymptotically equal to 10 microM. The decreased cell number was associated with G2/M phase arrest and apoptotic cell death, with the latter being evidenced by caspase-mediated cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and increased release of histone-associated DNA fragments. A peptide inhibitor of caspase-8 completely blocked SFN-induced apoptosis and that for caspase-9 exerted a major protection; however, neither inhibitor attenuated SFN-induced G2/M arrest. Regarding potential mediators, SFN treatment induced a transient rise of reactive oxygen species (ROS) peaking within (1/2) h and the activation of JNK within 1 h but did not have any detectable effect on the phosphorylation of p38MAPK or ERK1/2 from 6 h to 24 h. Pretreatment of cells with N-acetylcysteine to enrich intracellular glutathione blocked SFN-induced ROS and apoptotic cell death. Inhibiting the JNK activity with a pharmacologic inhibitor SP600125 abolished the induction of G2/M arrest and apoptosis by SFN, whereas chemical inhibitors for p38MAPK and MEK1/2 did not have any modulating effect on SFN-induced apoptosis. Taken together, the data indicate that SFN decreased viable DU145 cell number in large part through the generation of ROS and JNK-mediated signaling to G2/M arrest and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Selenium in the form of inorganic sodium selenite salt or methylseleninic acid did not enhance SFN-induced apoptosis in this cell culture model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16201852     DOI: 10.1207/s15327914nc5202_11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Cancer        ISSN: 0163-5581            Impact factor:   2.900


  32 in total

Review 1.  Dietary Sulforaphane in Cancer Chemoprevention: The Role of Epigenetic Regulation and HDAC Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephanie M Tortorella; Simon G Royce; Paul V Licciardi; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 2.  Role of reactive oxygen intermediates in cellular responses to dietary cancer chemopreventive agents.

Authors:  Jedrzej Antosiewicz; Wieslaw Ziolkowski; Siddhartha Kar; Anna A Powolny; Shivendra V Singh
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Sulforaphane as a Promising Natural Molecule for Cancer Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Osama A Elkashty; Simon D Tran
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-20

4.  Assessment of the anticancer mechanism of ferulic acid via cell cycle and apoptotic pathways in human prostate cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Canan Eroğlu; Mücahit Seçme; Gülseren Bağcı; Yavuz Dodurga
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-30

5.  Sulforaphane induction of p21(Cip1) cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor expression requires p53 and Sp1 transcription factors and is p53-dependent.

Authors:  Yap Ching Chew; Gautam Adhikary; Gerald M Wilson; Wen Xu; Richard L Eckert
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Chemoprevention against hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Okano; Yuki Fujise; Ryo Abe; Ryu Imamoto; Yoshikazu Murawaki
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-04

7.  Sulforaphane-induced apoptosis in Xuanwei lung adenocarcinoma cell line XWLC-05.

Authors:  Lan Zhou; Qian Yao; Yan Li; Yun-Chao Huang; Hua Jiang; Chuan-Qiong Wang; Lei Fan
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Differential modulation of keratin expression by sulforaphane occurs via Nrf2-dependent and -independent pathways in skin epithelia.

Authors:  Michelle Kerns; Daryle DePianto; Masayuki Yamamoto; Pierre A Coulombe
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Cellular responses to cancer chemopreventive agent D,L-sulforaphane in human prostate cancer cells are initiated by mitochondrial reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Dong Xiao; Anna A Powolny; Jedrzej Antosiewicz; Eun-Ryeong Hahm; Ajay Bommareddy; Yan Zeng; Dhimant Desai; Shantu Amin; Anna Herman-Antosiewicz; Shivendra V Singh
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Sulforaphane Increases Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor, p21 Protein in Human Oral Carcinoma Cells and Nude Mouse Animal Model to Induce G(2)/M Cell Cycle Arrest.

Authors:  Jun-Hee Kim; Ki Han Kwon; Ji-Youn Jung; Hye-Suk Han; Jung Hyun Shim; Sejun Oh; Kyeong-Hee Choi; Eun-Sun Choi; Ji-Ae Shin; Dae-Ho Leem; Yunjo Soh; Nam-Pyo Cho; Sung-Dae Cho
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.114

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.