Literature DB >> 16200468

Analysis of anatomic factors and age in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Stephanie C Lin1, Susan M Trocciola, Jason Rhee, Rajeev Dayal, Rabih Chaer, Nicholas J Morrissey, Leila Mureebe, James F McKinsey, K Craig Kent, Peter L Faries.   

Abstract

Recent data suggest that patient age >80 years may be associated with increased risk of periprocedural complications from carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). In this study, we analyzed anatomic risk factors in patients undergoing CAS based on age >80 or <80 years. Our hypothesis was that patients >80 would have more challenging anatomy. Between February 2003 and August 2004, 82 patients underwent CAS. Images for 57 lesions were available for review. Eighteen patients were > or =80 years old and 39 were <80. Cerebral protection devices, including EPI Filterwire, Percusurge, Accunet, and Angioguard, were used in all but two cases; and self-expanding stents (Wallstent, NexStent, Acculink, Precise) were placed in all. Arterial anatomic characteristics were assigned a score based on complexity and associated procedural risk. Characteristics evaluated using angiographic images were aortic arch elongation classification, arch calcification, common carotid/innominate stenosis, common carotid tortuosity, internal carotid tortuosity, index lesion length, index lesion calcification, and index lesion stenosis. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. CAS was successfully completed in 98% of cases. The two patients in whom we could not perform CAS were 79 and 83 years old. The anatomic characteristics that were statistically significantly more complex/severe in patients > or =80 were arch calcification (p = 0.045), common carotid/innominate stenosis (p = 0.023), common carotid tortuosity (p = 0.049), and internal carotid tortuosity (p = 0.032). There was no statistically significant difference in arch elongation classification, lesion length, lesion calcification, or stenosis severity (p = nonsignificant). Overall, patients > or =80 years had an increased incidence of complex anatomic risk factors compared to younger patients (p < 0.001). Cerebrovascular accident without residual deficits occurred in two patients; both were >80 years old. Complex arterial anatomy is more often present in patients >80 years and may explain the increased complication rates associated with CAS. Pre- or intraoperative consideration of these characteristics may help provide better risk assessment in candidates for CAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16200468     DOI: 10.1007/s10016-005-8045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  14 in total

1.  Carotid artery stenting: what you need to know.

Authors:  Rahul S Patel; Barry T Katzen
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Impact of Aortic Arch Anatomy on Technical Performance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  J A Knox; M D Alexander; D B McCoy; D C Murph; P J Hinckley; J C Ch'ang; C F Dowd; V V Halbach; R T Higashida; M R Amans; S W Hetts; D L Cooke
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Age-related complications following endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  A Khosla; W Brinjikji; H Cloft; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Influence of carotid tortuosity on internal carotid artery access time in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Z O Kaymaz; O Nikoubashman; M A Brockmann; M Wiesmann; C Brockmann
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Immediate and Delayed Procedural Stroke or Death in Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Mandy D Müller; Stefanie von Felten; Ale Algra; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Martin Brown; Richard Bulbulia; David Calvet; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gustav Fraedrich; Alison Halliday; Jeroen Hendrikse; John Gregson; George Howard; Olav Jansen; Jean-Louis Mas; Thomas G Brott; Peter A Ringleb; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Open-cell versus closed-cell stent design differences in blood flow velocities after carotid stenting.

Authors:  Damon S Pierce; Eric B Rosero; J Gregory Modrall; Beverley Adams-Huet; R James Valentine; G Patrick Clagett; Carlos H Timaran
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Is age of 80 years a threshold for carotid revascularization?

Authors:  Boudewijn L Reichmann; Guus W van Lammeren; Frans L Moll; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2011-02

8.  Transradial Approach for Deployment of a Flow Diverter for an Intracranial Aneurysm in a Patient with a Type-3 Aortic Arch.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Peitz; Bhavani Kura; Jeremiah N Johnson; Ramesh Grandhi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-10

9.  Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Chambers; Neil G Roberts
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-04

10.  Carotid Wallstent placement difficulties encountered in carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Kaoru Myouchin; Katsutoshi Takayama; Toshiaki Taoka; Hiroyuki Nakagawa; Takeshi Wada; Masahiko Sakamoto; Satoru Iwasaki; Shinichiro Kurokawa; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.