OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of photoactivation method on degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM) and Knoop hardness (KHN) of a composite and an unfilled resin (Filtek Z250 and Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, 3M ESPE) after storage in water or ethanol, and on composite contraction stress (CS). METHODS: Specimens 1x2x10 mm were prepared for FS test, photoactivated by 600 mW/cm2 x 40 s (A), 200 mW/cm2 x 120 s (B), or 600 mW/cm2 x1 s +3 min delay +600 mW/cm2 x 39 s (C), and tested after 24 h in water or ethanol. Load and displacement values were used to calculate FM. Specimen fragments were used to measure KHN. DC was determined by FT-Raman spectroscopy. CS was determined by mechanical testing. Data were submitted to ANOVA/Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Composite DC was not affected by photoactivation (A: 65+/-1.8%; B: 66+/-3.4%; C: 65+/-2.9%). Unfilled resin DC was statistically higher using method A (79+/-0.3%) than B (74+/-1.0%) and C (73+/-0.9%). Photoactivation did not influence composite properties, regardless of the storage medium (p>0.05). After ethanol storage, FS of the unfilled resin was lower for specimens irradiated by method B (p<0.001). Pulse-delay curing (C) significantly reduced CS (7.7+/-1.3 MPa), compared to A (10.7+/-1.2 MPa) and B (10.1+/-1.3 MPa). SIGNIFICANCE: Photoactivation method did not affect composite properties or susceptibility to ethanol degradation. For the unfilled resin, DC was lower with the use of low intensity and pulse-curing, while FS after ethanol storage was reduced by low intensity curing. Pulse-delay curing significantly reduced CS.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of photoactivation method on degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM) and Knoop hardness (KHN) of a composite and an unfilled resin (Filtek Z250 and Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, 3M ESPE) after storage in water or ethanol, and on composite contraction stress (CS). METHODS: Specimens 1x2x10 mm were prepared for FS test, photoactivated by 600 mW/cm2 x 40 s (A), 200 mW/cm2 x 120 s (B), or 600 mW/cm2 x1 s +3 min delay +600 mW/cm2 x 39 s (C), and tested after 24 h in water or ethanol. Load and displacement values were used to calculate FM. Specimen fragments were used to measure KHN. DC was determined by FT-Raman spectroscopy. CS was determined by mechanical testing. Data were submitted to ANOVA/Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Composite DC was not affected by photoactivation (A: 65+/-1.8%; B: 66+/-3.4%; C: 65+/-2.9%). Unfilled resin DC was statistically higher using method A (79+/-0.3%) than B (74+/-1.0%) and C (73+/-0.9%). Photoactivation did not influence composite properties, regardless of the storage medium (p>0.05). After ethanol storage, FS of the unfilled resin was lower for specimens irradiated by method B (p<0.001). Pulse-delay curing (C) significantly reduced CS (7.7+/-1.3 MPa), compared to A (10.7+/-1.2 MPa) and B (10.1+/-1.3 MPa). SIGNIFICANCE: Photoactivation method did not affect composite properties or susceptibility to ethanol degradation. For the unfilled resin, DC was lower with the use of low intensity and pulse-curing, while FS after ethanol storage was reduced by low intensity curing. Pulse-delay curing significantly reduced CS.
Authors: Josué Martos; Luiz Fernando Machado Silveira; Carina Folgearini Silveira; Luis Antonio Suita de Castro; Carmen María Ferrer-Luque Journal: Eur J Dent Date: 2013-07