OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study the impact of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 polymorphism on the tolerability of metoprolol in a real-life primary care setting. The adverse effects studied comprised effects related to the central nervous system, cardiovascular effects, and sexual dysfunction. METHODS: Patients in whom treatment with metoprolol was considered were enrolled into this prospective, 6-week multicenter study. The dosage of metoprolol was determined on an individual basis and could be freely adjusted on clinical grounds. The indication for treatment was hypertension in about 90% of cases. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, resting heart rate, and plasma metoprolol and alpha-hydroxymetoprolol concentrations were measured. CYP2D6 genotyping covered alleles *3 to *10 and *41 and the duplications. Possible adverse effects of metoprolol were systematically assessed over a 6-week period by means of standardized rating scales and questionnaires. RESULTS: The final study population comprised 121 evaluable patients (all white patients); among them, there were 5 ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs) (4.1%), 91 extensive metabolizers (EMs) (75%), 21 intermediate metabolizers (IMs) (17%), and 4 poor metabolizers (PMs) (3.3%). Plasma metoprolol concentrations normalized for the daily dose and metoprolol/alpha-hydroxymetoprolol ratios at steady state were markedly influenced by CYP2D6 genotype and displayed a gene-dose effect. The median of the dose-normalized metoprolol concentration was 0.0088 ng/mL, 0.047 ng/mL, 0.34 ng/mL, and 1.34 ng/mL among UMs, EMs, IMs, and PMs, respectively (P<.0001). There was no significant association between CYP2D6 genotype-derived phenotype (EMs and UMs combined versus PMs and IMs combined) and adverse effects during treatment with metoprolol. There was a tendency toward a more frequent occurrence of cold extremities in the PM plus IM group as compared with the EM plus UM group (16.0% versus 4.2%, P=.056; relative risk, 3.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.03--14.3]). CONCLUSIONS: CYP2D6 genotype-derived phenotype was not significantly associated with a propensity for adverse effects to develop during treatment with metoprolol. However, the results concerning tolerability of metoprolol in PMs were inconclusive because of the small number of PMs enrolled.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study the impact of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 polymorphism on the tolerability of metoprolol in a real-life primary care setting. The adverse effects studied comprised effects related to the central nervous system, cardiovascular effects, and sexual dysfunction. METHODS:Patients in whom treatment with metoprolol was considered were enrolled into this prospective, 6-week multicenter study. The dosage of metoprolol was determined on an individual basis and could be freely adjusted on clinical grounds. The indication for treatment was hypertension in about 90% of cases. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, resting heart rate, and plasma metoprolol and alpha-hydroxymetoprolol concentrations were measured. CYP2D6 genotyping covered alleles *3 to *10 and *41 and the duplications. Possible adverse effects of metoprolol were systematically assessed over a 6-week period by means of standardized rating scales and questionnaires. RESULTS: The final study population comprised 121 evaluable patients (all white patients); among them, there were 5 ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs) (4.1%), 91 extensive metabolizers (EMs) (75%), 21 intermediate metabolizers (IMs) (17%), and 4 poor metabolizers (PMs) (3.3%). Plasma metoprolol concentrations normalized for the daily dose and metoprolol/alpha-hydroxymetoprolol ratios at steady state were markedly influenced by CYP2D6 genotype and displayed a gene-dose effect. The median of the dose-normalized metoprolol concentration was 0.0088 ng/mL, 0.047 ng/mL, 0.34 ng/mL, and 1.34 ng/mL among UMs, EMs, IMs, and PMs, respectively (P<.0001). There was no significant association between CYP2D6 genotype-derived phenotype (EMs and UMs combined versus PMs and IMs combined) and adverse effects during treatment with metoprolol. There was a tendency toward a more frequent occurrence of cold extremities in the PM plus IM group as compared with the EM plus UM group (16.0% versus 4.2%, P=.056; relative risk, 3.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.03--14.3]). CONCLUSIONS:CYP2D6 genotype-derived phenotype was not significantly associated with a propensity for adverse effects to develop during treatment with metoprolol. However, the results concerning tolerability of metoprolol in PMs were inconclusive because of the small number of PMs enrolled.
Authors: Daniel V Neves; Vera L Lanchote; Miguel Moysés Neto; José A Cardeal da Costa; Carolina P Vieira; Eduardo B Coelho Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Andrew A Monte; Kelsey West; Kyle T McDaniel; Hania K Flaten; Jessica Saben; Shelby Shelton; Farah Abdelmawla; Lane R Bushman; Kayla Williamson; Diana Abbott; Peter L Anderson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jasmine A Luzum; Kevin M Sweet; Philip F Binkley; Tara J Schmidlen; Joseph P Jarvis; Michael F Christman; Wolfgang Sadee; Joseph P Kitzmiller Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Massimiliano Donzelli; Adrian Derungs; Maria-Giovanna Serratore; Christoph Noppen; Lana Nezic; Stephan Krähenbühl; Manuel Haschke Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 6.447