Literature DB >> 16198392

Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus- and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli.

Yuuki Okada1, Kazuhiko Ukai, James S Wolffsohn, Bernard Gilmartin, Atsuhiko Iijima, Takehiko Bando.   

Abstract

Asthenopia, or visual fatigue, is a frequent complaint from observers of stereoscopic three-dimensional displays. It has been proposed that asthenopia is a consequence of anomalous oculomotor responses generated by conflict between accommodative and convergence stimuli. The hypothesis was examined by measuring accommodation and convergence continuously with a Shin-Nippon SRW5000 infrared autorefractor and a limbus tracking device. Subjects viewed a high contrast Maltese Cross target at three levels of Gaussian filter target blur under conditions of relatively low- and high-conflict between accommodation and convergence stimuli, the latter inducing the sensation of stereopsis. Under the low-conflict conditions accommodation was stable, but convergence-driven accommodation was dominant when the target was extremely blurred. Under the high-conflict conditions the role of convergence-driven accommodation increased systematically with the degree of target blur. It is proposed that defocus-driven accommodation becomes weak when the target comprises low spatial frequency components. Large accommodative overshoots to step stimuli that are not blurred or only mildly blurred were consistently observed and are attributed to the initial accommodative response being convergence-driven. Whereas the possibility that high-conflict conditions are a cause of asthenopia has been previously reported, this is the first evidence that they specifically affect accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic displays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198392     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Clear and Single Binocular Vision in Near 3D Displays.

Authors:  Glen L McCormack; Katherine M Hogan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Virtual reality training improves accommodative facility and accommodative range.

Authors:  Dong-Yu Guo; Yuan-Yuan Shen; Miao-Miao Zhu; Yang-Yang Zhan; Xia-Wei Wang; Jian-Hua Xia; Bo Jiang; Yang-Shun Gu; Yan Long
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Image Size and the Range of Clear and Single Binocular Vision in 3D Displays.

Authors:  Glen L McCormack; Kathryn A Kulowski
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  The use of cues to convergence and accommodation in naïve, uninstructed participants.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  New stereoacuity test using a 3-dimensional display system in children.

Authors:  Sang Beom Han; Hee Kyung Yang; Jonghyun Kim; Keehoon Hong; Byoungho Lee; Jeong-Min Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Empirical Evaluation of Visual Fatigue from Display Alignment Errors Using Cerebral Hemodynamic Responses.

Authors:  Hanniebey D Wiyor; Celestine A Ntuen
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2013-12-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.