Literature DB >> 16198219

Patient perceptions of quality in discharge instruction.

Paul Alexander Clark1, Maxwell Drain, Sabina B Gesell, Deirdre M Mylod, Dennis O Kaldenberg, Julie Hamilton.   

Abstract

The present study investigates patient perceptions of the quality of discharge instruction by assessing inpatients' ratings of care and service in the United States over the past 5 years (1997-2001) (n = 4,901,178). As expected, patients' ratings of "instructions given about how to care for yourself at home" showed a strong, consistent positive relationship with overall patient satisfaction from 1997 through 2001. Nevertheless, patient satisfaction with discharge instructions decreased significantly each year (p < 0.001). Patients gave lower ratings to the quality of discharge instruction than to the overall quality of their hospital stay which indicates a failure to match the quality delivered among other services within the hospital. Patient assessments of discharge instruction quality varied systematically among conditions. Patients with musculoskeletal diseases and disorders (MDC-8) rated discharge instruction considerably lower than all other patient groups. Patients' age, sex, self-described health status and length of stay did not predict patients' evaluations of discharge instructions. U.S. hospitals may not be meeting existing AMA and JCAHO standards for patient education and discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16198219     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  16 in total

1.  Automated pictographic illustration of discharge instructions with Glyph: impact on patient recall and satisfaction.

Authors:  Brent Hill; Seneca Perri-Moore; Jinqiu Kuang; Bruce E Bray; Long Ngo; Alexa Doig; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Rationale and design of the Pharmacist Intervention for Low Literacy in Cardiovascular Disease (PILL-CVD) study.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Schnipper; Christianne L Roumie; Courtney Cawthon; Alexandra Businger; Anuj K Dalal; Ileko Mugalla; Svetlana Eden; Terry A Jacobson; Kimberly J Rask; Viola Vaccarino; Tejal K Gandhi; David W Bates; Daniel C Johnson; Stephanie Labonville; David Gregory; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-03

3.  Pediatric solid organ transplant recipients: transition to home and chronic illness care.

Authors:  Stacee M Lerret; Marianne E Weiss; Gail L Stendahl; Shelley Chapman; Jerome Menendez; Laurel Williams; Michelle L Nadler; Katie Neighbors; Katie Amsden; Yumei Cao; Melodee Nugent; Estella M Alonso; Pippa Simpson
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2014-11-26

4.  Collaborating to enhance patient education and recovery.

Authors:  Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Michelle L Burda; Barbara A Epstein; Barbara Lawrence
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-10

5.  Improving patient comprehension and recall of discharge instructions by supplementing free texts with pictographs.

Authors:  Qing Zeng-Treitler; Hyeoneui Kim; Martha Hunter
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

6.  Association of Health Literacy With Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Jesse P Wright; Gretchen C Edwards; Kathryn Goggins; Vikram Tiwari; Amelia Maiga; Kelvin Moses; Sunil Kripalani; Kamran Idrees
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Patient Satisfaction is Equivalent for Inpatient and Outpatient Minimally-Invasive Adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Richard Augusto Pigg; Jessica M Fazendin; John R Porterfield; Herbert Chen; Brenessa Lindeman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Patients' views on an education booklet following spinal surgery.

Authors:  A H McGregor; A Henley; T P Morris; C J Doré
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparing Patients' Opinions on the Hospital Discharge Process Collected With a Self-Reported Questionnaire Completed Via the Internet or Through a Telephone Survey: An Ancillary Study of the SENTIPAT Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Berengere Couturier; Fabrice Carrat; Gilles Hejblum
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Assessment of pictographs developed through a participatory design process using an online survey tool.

Authors:  Hyeoneui Kim; Carlos Nakamura; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.