Literature DB >> 16198018

Why do not all hip- and knee patients facing long waiting times accept re-referral to hospitals with short waiting time? Questionnaire study.

Hans Okkels Birk1, Lars Onsberg Henriksen.   

Abstract

Patients' preferences are often assumed to be homogeneous and to favour hospitals with a short waiting time and high quality. Due to long waiting times (6 months) for artificial hip or knee implantation a Danish county in 1999-2000 offered patients on a waiting list a choice between remaining on the local hospital's waiting list with the long waiting time, or re-referral to a hospital outside the county with a shorter waiting time. Fewer patients than expected took advantage of the offer of re-referral ("accepters"): 89 of 149 patients (60%). In 2003, we asked patients about the reasons for their choice: 87% of patients responded. Respondents and non-respondents were similar by decision, choice of hospital, diagnosis and age; men were significantly more likely to respond than women. Accepters and decliners were similar by age, sex, diagnosis and the presence of a car in the household. Short distance, short transport time and previous experience with the nearby hospital were the most important reasons for choosing that hospital. Some patients appeared to be willing to accept a long waiting time, if they were told exactly when they would undergo surgery. The results of this study question the validity of the conventional wisdom, that patients are willing to travel long distances in order to receive treatment with short waiting time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198018     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

1.  Patients' and clinicians' views of comparing the performance of providers of surgery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Zoe Hildon; Dominique Allwood; Nick Black
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Barbara Conner-Spady; Claudia Sanmartin; Geoffrey Johnston; John McGurran; Melissa Kehler; Tom Noseworthy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The effects of publishing emergency department wait time on patient utilization patterns in a community with two emergency department sites: a retrospective, quasi-experiment design.

Authors:  Bin Xie; Sabrina Youash
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-14

Review 4.  What is the influence of single-entry models on access to elective surgical procedures? A systematic review.

Authors:  Zaheed Damani; Barbara Conner-Spady; Tina Nash; Henry Tom Stelfox; Tom W Noseworthy; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model.

Authors:  David Ikkersheim; Marit Tanke; Gwendy van Schooten; Niels de Bresser; Hein Fleuren
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Rubén E Mújica Mota; Rosanna Tarricone; Oriana Ciani; John F P Bridges; Mike Drummond
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Patient experiences with interventions to reduce surgery cancellations: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Einar Hovlid; Christian von Plessen; Kjell Haug; Aslak Bjarne Aslaksen; Oddbjørn Bukve
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.