Literature DB >> 16197695

Common and differential neural mechanisms supporting imitation of meaningful and meaningless actions.

Raffaella I Rumiati1, Peter H Weiss, Alessia Tessari, Ann Assmus, Karl Zilles, Hans Herzog, Gereon R Fink.   

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies indicate that, after brain damage, the ability to imitate meaningful or meaningless actions can be selectively impaired. However, the neural bases supporting the imitation of these two types of action are still poorly understood. Using PET, we investigated in 10 healthy individuals the neural mechanisms of imitating novel, meaningless actions and familiar, meaningful actions. Data were analyzed using SPM99. During imitation, a significant positive correlation (p < .05, corrected) of regional cerebral blood flow with the amount of meaningful actions was observed in the left inferior temporal gyrus only. In contrast, a significant positive correlation (p < .05, corrected) with the amount of meaningless movements was observed in the right parieto-occipital junction. The direct categorical comparison of imitating meaningful (100%) relative to meaningless (100%) actions showed differential increases in neural activity (p < .001, uncorrected) in the left inferior temporal gyrus, the left parahippocampal gyrus, and the left angular gyrus. The reverse categorical comparison of imitating meaningless (100%) relative to meaningful (100%) actions revealed differential increases in neural activity (p < .001, uncorrected) in the superior parietal cortex bilaterally, in the right parieto-occipital junction, in the right occipital-temporal junction (MT, V5), and in the left superior temporal gyrus. Increased neural activity common to imitation of meaningless and meaningful actions compared to action observation was observed in a network of areas known to be involved in imitation of actions including the primary sensorimotor cortex, the supplementary motor area, and the ventral premotor cortex. These results are compatible with the two-route model of action imitation which suggests that there are at least two mechanisms involved in imitation of actions: a direct mechanism transforming a novel action into a motor output, and a semantic mechanism, on the basis of stored memories, that allows reproductions of known actions. Our results indicate that, in addition to shared neural processes, the direct and the semantic mechanisms that underlie action imitation also draw upon differential neural mechanisms. The direct mechanism underlying imitation of meaningless actions differentially involves visuospatial transformation processes as evidenced by activation of areas belonging to the dorsal stream. In contrast, imitation of meaningful actions differentially involves semantic processing as evidenced by activation of areas belonging to the ventral stream.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16197695     DOI: 10.1162/0898929054985374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  41 in total

1.  Imitation assessment and its utility to the diagnosis of autism: evidence from consecutive clinical preschool referrals for suspected autism.

Authors:  Marleen Vanvuchelen; Herbert Roeyers; Willy De Weerdt
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-04

2.  [Structural and functional neuroimaging of the pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  P H Weiss; G R Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Low Fidelity Imitation of Atypical Biological Kinematics in Autism Spectrum Disorders Is Modulated by Self-Generated Selective Attention.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Matthew Andrew; Digby Elliott; Emma Gowen; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-02

4.  Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Movement Imitation via an Abstract Trajectory Representation in Dorsal Premotor Cortex.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Steven A Jax; Louisa L Smith; Laurel J Buxbaum; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A new way to quantify the fidelity of imitation: preliminary results with gesture sequences.

Authors:  Brian J Gold; Marc Pomplun; Nichola J Rice; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation.

Authors:  Raffaella I Rumiati; Joana C Carmo; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  STIMA: a short screening test for ideo-motor apraxia, selective for action meaning and bodily district.

Authors:  Alessia Tessari; Alessio Toraldo; Alberta Lunardelli; Antonietta Zadini; Raffaella Ida Rumiati
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.