Literature DB >> 16197610

A measure of health-related quality of life among patients with localized prostate cancer: results from ongoing scale development.

Christie A Befort1, Michael J Zelefsky, Peter T Scardino, Evelinn Borrayo, R Brian Giesler, Michael W Kattan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We revised our prostate cancer-specific measure to better address the physiologic complications of the 3 major therapies for clinically localized prostate cancer and to assess the impact of symptoms on broader aspects of patient functioning. The study used a cross-sectional design, and participants completed the measure in a clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants underwent radical prostatectomy (n = 130), external beam radiation therapy (n = 120), or brachytherapy (n = 129). Their mean age was 66 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.2 years), and the median time since treatment was 12.36 months (mean, 21.7; SD, 25.4). Items were derived from previously validated instruments or developed based on the clinical experience of a multidisciplinary group of health professionals.
RESULTS: The revised instrument included 46 items that formed 8 physiologic scales (2 urinary, 3 sexual, and 3 bowel function); 3 associated bother scales; and cancer worry, treatment regret, and treatment satisfaction scales. Correlations among scales provided evidence of convergent/divergent validity. Significant group differences were found using analysis of covariance (with time since treatment and age as covariates) on 6 of the 8 physiologic scales and on bowel bother and treatment satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: The instrument provides a sensitive measure of physiologic differences across the 3 primary treatment groups and indicates that there are few differences across treatment groups on broader aspects of health-related quality of life. Further development of the measure is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16197610     DOI: 10.3816/cgc.2005.n.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Prostate Cancer        ISSN: 1540-0352


  14 in total

1.  The association between race and treatment regret among men with recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  B A Mahal; M-H Chen; C L Bennett; M W Kattan; O Sartor; K Stein; A V D'Amico; P L Nguyen
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Longitudinal assessment of quality of life after surgery, conformal brachytherapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Bing Ying Poon; James Eastham; Andrew Vickers; Xin Pei; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Exploring the Optimal Erectile Function Domain Score Cutoff That Defines Sexual Satisfaction After Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jean E Terrier; John P Mulhall; Christian J Nelson
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Erectile Function and Sexual Satisfaction: The Importance of Asking About Sexual Desire.

Authors:  Carlo Andrea Bravi; Amy Tin; Francesco Montorsi; John P Mulhall; James A Eastham; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to Increase Adherence to Penile Injection Therapy-Based Rehabilitation After Radical Prostatectomy: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Rebecca M Saracino; Stephanie Napolitano; Hayley Pessin; Joseph B Narus; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Electronic patient self-assessment and management (SAM): a novel framework for cancer survivorship.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Talya Salz; Ethan Basch; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll; Foss Tighe; James Eastham; Raymond C Rosen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Loss of masculine identity, marital affection, and sexual bother in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Talia Zaider; Sharon Manne; Christian Nelson; John Mulhall; David Kissane
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Back to baseline: erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy from the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Validation study of a web-based assessment of functional recovery after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Caroline J Savage; Marwan Shouery; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Ethan M Basch
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Have urinary function outcomes after radical prostatectomy improved over the past decade?

Authors:  Matthew B Clements; Caroline C Gmelich; Emily A Vertosick; Jim C Hu; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Vincent P Laudone; Karim A Touijer; Jonathan A Coleman; Andrew J Vickers; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.