Literature DB >> 1619631

Experience with direct molecular diagnosis of fragile X.

J C Mulley1, S Yu, A K Gedeon, A Donnelly, G Turner, D Loesch, C J Chapman, R J Gardner, R I Richards, G R Sutherland.   

Abstract

The utility of the pfxa3 probe for direct molecular diagnosis of the fragile X (FRAXA) has been established. This probe detects amplification of an unstable DNA element consisting of variable length CCG repeats. The size of the amplified fragment is correlated with phenotype and was determined using PstI digested DNA in family members. In 35 families with the fragile X, there was correspondence in 183 cases between the presence of an amplified unstable element and the presence of the fragile X chromosome independently determined by cytogenetics, position in the pedigree, or linked DNA markers flanking the fragile X. There was also correspondence in 124 cases between the presence of the normal 1.0 kb PstI fragment and absence of the fragile X chromosome independently determined by linked flanking markers. Six additional families considered to be isolated cases of 'fragile X' had been diagnosed before recognition of FRAXD. The pfxa3 probe confirmed the cytogenetic diagnosis in three families, the other three being rediagnosed as non-fragile X. A further two families had consistent expression of a different folate sensitive fragile site, FRAXE, close to FRAXA but not associated with fragile X syndrome and not detectable with the pfxa3 probe. Subsequent referrals were received from additional family members or from members of new families for whom carrier status had not been predetermined by linked markers. Direct pfxa3 diagnosis for the 135 females within these 222 additional cases was confirmed by dosage analysis with the control probe pS8.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1619631      PMCID: PMC1015984          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.29.6.368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  14 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis of fragile X syndrome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Mapping of DNA instability at the fragile X to a trinucleotide repeat sequence p(CCG)n.

Authors:  E J Kremer; M Pritchard; M Lynch; S Yu; K Holman; E Baker; S T Warren; D Schlessinger; G R Sutherland; R I Richards
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Centre d'etude du polymorphisme humain (CEPH): collaborative genetic mapping of the human genome.

Authors:  J Dausset; H Cann; D Cohen; M Lathrop; J M Lalouel; R White
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Study of a family with a fragile site of the X chromosome at Xq27-28 without mental retardation.

Authors:  M A Voelckel; N Philip; C Piquet; M C Pellissier; I Oberlé; F Birg; M G Mattei; J F Mattei
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Linkage between the fragile X and F9, DXS52 (St14), DXS98 (4D-8) and DXS105 (cX55.7).

Authors:  J Mulley; G Turner; S Bain; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1988 May-Jun

6.  Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A J Verkerk; M Pieretti; J S Sutcliffe; Y H Fu; D P Kuhl; A Pizzuti; O Reiner; S Richards; M F Victoria; F P Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-05-31       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.

Authors:  Y H Fu; D P Kuhl; A Pizzuti; M Pieretti; J S Sutcliffe; S Richards; A J Verkerk; J J Holden; R G Fenwick; S T Warren
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Further segregation analysis of the fragile X syndrome with special reference to transmitting males.

Authors:  S L Sherman; P A Jacobs; N E Morton; U Froster-Iskenius; P N Howard-Peebles; K B Nielsen; M W Partington; G R Sutherland; G Turner; M Watson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Linkage and genetic counselling for the fragile X using DNA probes 52A, F9, DX13, and ST14.

Authors:  J C Mulley; A K Gedeon; K A Thorn; L J Bates; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1987-06

10.  The common fragile site in band q27 of the human X chromosome is not coincident with the fragile X.

Authors:  G R Sutherland; E Baker
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.438

View more
  12 in total

1.  Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular analysis of three families with FRAXE.

Authors:  A J Barnicoat; Q Wang; J Turk; E Green; C G Mathew; G Flynn; V Buckle; M Hirst; K Davies; M Bobrow
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Between-generation differences in ascertainment and penetrance: relevance to genetic hypotheses in fragile X.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; L J Sheffield; D A Hay
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Phenotype correlation and intergenerational dynamics of the Friedreich ataxia GAA trinucleotide repeat.

Authors:  E Monrós; M D Moltó; F Martínez; J Cañizares; J Blanca; J J Vílchez; F Prieto; R de Frutos; F Palau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. National Fragile X Foundation.

Authors:  B A Oostra; P B Jacky; W T Brown; F Rousseau
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Genotype-phenotype relationships in fragile X syndrome: a family study.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; R Huggins; D A Hay; A K Gedeon; J C Mulley; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Recurrent and unexpected segregation of the FMR1 CGG repeat in a family with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  E Mornet; C Chateau; A Taillandier; B Simon-Bouy; J L Serre
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Direct molecular analysis of the fragile X syndrome in a sample of Egyptian and German patients using non-radioactive PCR and Southern blot followed by chemiluminescent detection.

Authors:  A A el-Aleem; I Böhm; S Temtamy; M el-Awady; M Awadalla; J Schmidtke; M Stuhrmann
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Absence of FMR-1 gene expression can be detected with RNA extracted from dried blood specimens.

Authors:  J T Pai; S F Tsai; C J Horng; P C Chiu; M Y Cheng; K J Hsiao; K D Wuu
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Apparent regression of the CGG repeat in FMR1 to an allele of normal size.

Authors:  L Vits; K De Boulle; E Reyniers; I Handig; J K Darby; B Oostra; P J Willems
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Molecular analysis of mutations in the gene FMR-1 segregating in fragile X families.

Authors:  P Steinbach; D Wöhrle; G Tariverdian; I Kennerknecht; G Barbi; H Edlinger; H Enders; M Götz-Sothmann; H Heilbronner; D Hosenfeld
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.