Literature DB >> 1619628

The psychological profile of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study.

S C Harth1, R R Johnstone, Y H Thong.   

Abstract

Three standard psychometric tests were administered to parents who volunteered their children for a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of a new asthma drug and to a control group of parents whose children were eligible for the trial but had declined the invitation. The trial took place at a children's hospital in Australia. The subjects comprised 68 parents who had volunteered their children and 42 who had not, a participation rate of 94 per cent and 70 per cent, respectively. The responses of these parents to the Gordon Survey of Interpersonal Values Questionnaire, the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory and the Cattell Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire were analysed by computer. There was a marked difference between the psychological profiles of the two groups of parents. Volunteering parents put more value on benevolence while non-volunteering parents were more concerned with power and prestige. The self-esteem of volunteering parents was much lower than that of non-volunteering parents. Finally, volunteering parents were more introverted, exhibited greater anxiety and low supergo, while non-volunteering parents appeared to have greater social confidence and emotional stability. Since an individual's values, self-esteem and personality may be important antecedents of behaviour, these findings suggest that parents who volunteer their children for clinical research are not only socially disadvantaged and emotionally vulnerable, but may also be psychologically predisposed to volunteering. Furthermore, these findings provide evidence for the existence of a psychosocial 'filter' effect of the informed consent procedure, which may be discouraging the better educated, more privileged and psychologically resilient members of society from participation as research subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1619628      PMCID: PMC1376113          DOI: 10.1136/jme.18.2.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  Sociodemographic and motivational characteristics of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study.

Authors:  S C Harth; Y H Thong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-05-26

2.  Ethics of clinical research: lessons for the future.

Authors:  M Baum; K Zilkha; J Houghton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-22

3.  Proxy consent in the experimentation situation.

Authors:  R A McCormick
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  Informed consent as a form of volunteer bias.

Authors:  M J Edlund; T J Craig; M A Richardson
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Informed consent: influence on patient selection among critically ill premature infants.

Authors:  J N Walterspiel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.124

  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and above-minimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; Robert D Annett; David G Scherer; Mandy L Perryman; Keely M W Cofrin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Factors associated with parents' willingness to enroll their children in trials for COVID-19 vaccination.

Authors:  Ran D Goldman; Georg Staubli; Cristina Parra Cotanda; Julie C Brown; Julia Hoeffe; Michelle Seiler; Renana Gelernter; Jeanine E Hall; Mark A Griffiths; Adrienne L Davis; Sergio Manzano; Ahmed Mater; Sara Ahmed; David Sheridan; Matt Hansen; Samina Ali; Graham C Thompson; Naoki Shimizu; Eileen J Klein
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Aftercare for participants in clinical research: ethical considerations in an asthma drug trial.

Authors:  S C Harth; Y H Thong
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.

Authors:  Alejandro Hoberman; Nader Shaikh; Sonika Bhatnagar; Mary Ann Haralam; Diana H Kearney; D Kathleen Colborn; Michelle L Kienholz; Li Wang; Clareann H Bunker; Ron Keren; Myra A Carpenter; Saul P Greenfield; Hans G Pohl; Ranjiv Mathews; Marva Moxey-Mims; Russell W Chesney
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 5.  Consent for neonatal research.

Authors:  L McKechnie; A B Gill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Illness severity and parental permission for clinical research in a pediatric ICU population.

Authors:  Jessie M Hulst; Jeroen W B Peters; Ada van den Bos; Koen F M Joosten; Johannes B van Goudoever; Luc J I Zimmermann; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Annual research review: Current limitations and future directions in MRI studies of child- and adult-onset developmental psychopathologies.

Authors:  Guillermo Horga; Tejal Kaur; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 8.  The efficacy of triptans in childhood and adolescence migraine.

Authors:  Stefan Evers
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-07

9.  Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery.

Authors:  J A F Zupancic; H Kirpalani; J Barrett; S Stewart; A Gafni; D Streiner; M L Beecroft; P Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.747

10.  Analysis of motivations that lead women to participate (or not) in a newborn cohort study.

Authors:  Liza Vecchi Brumatti; Marcella Montico; Stefano Russian; Veronica Tognin; Maura Bin; Fabio Barbone; Patrizia Volpi; Luca Ronfani
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.