Literature DB >> 16193795

Consequences of the spectral response of an a-Si EPID and implications for dosimetric calibration.

C Kirkby1, R Sloboda.   

Abstract

One of the attractive features of amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (a-Si EPIDs) as dosimetric tools is that for open fields they are known to exhibit a generally linear relation between pixel value and incident energy fluence as measured by an ion chamber. It has also been established that a-Si EPIDs incorporating high atomic number phosphors such as Gd2O2S:Tb exhibit a disproportionately large response to low-energy (<1 MeV) photons. The present work examines the consequences of this hypersensitivity in a commercially available EPID, the Varian aS500, with respect to energy fluence calibration in a 6 MV radiotherapy beam. EPIDs may be deployed in situations where the spectrum of the incident beam is modified by passing through a compensator or through a patient or phantom. By examining the specific case of a beam hardened by passage through compensator material, we show that the discrepancy between open and attenuated beam calibration curves can be as high as 8%. A Monte Carlo study using a comprehensive model of the aS500 shows that this difference can be explained by spectral changes, and further suggests that it can be reduced by the addition of an external copper plate. We consider configurations with the plate placed directly on top of the EPID cassette and 15 cm above the cassette, supported by Styrofoam. In order to reduce the maximum discrepancy to <4%, it was found that a copper thickness of approximately 0.7 cm was required in the elevated configuration. Improvement was minimal with the copper in the contact configuration. Adding 0.7 cm of copper in the elevated configuration reduced the contrast-to-noise ratio by 19% and the modulation transfer for a given spatial frequency by 30%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16193795     DOI: 10.1118/1.1984335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers.

Authors:  Song Wang; Joseph K Gardner; John J Gordon; Weidong Li; Luke Clews; Peter B Greer; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The Influence of Acquisition Mode on the Dosimetric Performance of an Amorphous Silicon Electronic Portal Imaging Device.

Authors:  Omemh Bawazeer; Sisira Herath; Siva Sarasanandarajah; Tomas Kron; Pradip Deb
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

3.  An empirical calibration method for an a-Si portal imaging device: applications in pretreatment verification of IMRT.

Authors:  L Conte; C Mordacchini; L Pozzi; C Vite
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.

Authors:  Michael P Barnes; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Portal dosimetry in wedged beams.

Authors:  Hanno Spreeuw; Roel Rozendaal; Priscilla Camargo; Anton Mans; Markus Wendling; Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Marcel Van Herk; Ben Mijnheer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice.

Authors:  Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz; Sam Beddar; Peter Greer; Nuria Jornet; Boyd McCurdy; Gabriel Paiva-Fonseca; Ben Mijnheer; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-29

7.  An empirical model of electronic portal imager response implemented within a commercial treatment planning system for verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy fields.

Authors:  Rao F H Khan; Orest Z Ostapiak; Joe J Szabo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Two-dimensional in vivo dose verification using portal imaging and correlation ratios.

Authors:  Stefano Peca; Derek W Brown
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.