Literature DB >> 16193792

Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: application to ultrasound quality control.

K R Gorny1, D J Tradup, N J Hangiandreou.   

Abstract

Systematic measurements of maximum depth of penetration (DOP) of ultrasound (US) scanners are essential for quality control (QC). Conventionally, DOP measurements are performed visually and as such they could be affected by various external factors, scanner control settings, and operator related errors. Automated methods should be free of the issues associated with interoperator dependence and are an attractive alternative to the visual DOP measurements. We implement and test three automated methods for measuring DOP. The methods base their measurements on signal to noise (SNR) analysis of uniform US phantom images. Two of the methods use pairs of phantom images. The third one uses a single phantom image and an "in-air" image. The validation tests included precision, sensitivity, repeatability, and usability in routine QC application. Methods based on pairs of phantom images measure the DOP with precision +/-0.2 cm or better. Precision of the single phantom image method is +/-0.05 cm, and that method is also the most sensitive of the three. All three methods are demonstrated to be repeatable among different users. Since the images for the DOP computation are collected free-hand the sensitivity to hand-transducer motion during image acquisition was also tested. Unlike the single-phantom-image based method, the methods using image pairs were found to be very sensitive to transducer motion and therefore less convenient for clinical QC applications. In conclusion, the single-phantom-image method is best suited for routine QC in a real-life clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16193792     DOI: 10.1118/1.1951095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Quality control of ultrasound transducers: analysis of evaluation parameters and results of a survey of 116 transducers in a single hospital.

Authors:  P Cozzolino; R Stramare; A Udilano; M Castoro; E Scagliori; V Beltrame; L Rubaltelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Early experience with automated B-mode quality assurance tests.

Authors:  N J Dudley; N M Gibson
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-12-19

3.  A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms.

Authors:  A Scorza; S Conforto; C D'Anna; S A Sciuto
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2015-07-31

4.  Automated quality control of ultrasound based on in-air reverberation patterns.

Authors:  Pepijn van Horssen; Arnold Schilham; Dennis Dickerscheid; Niels van der Werf; Han Keijzers; Ronald van Almere; Joost Kuijer; Rob Peters; Mark Hofman
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2017-09-29

5.  Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner.

Authors:  Zaiyang Long; Donald J Tradup; Scott F Stekel; Krzysztof R Gorny; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.