Literature DB >> 16193400

The use of observational diaries in in-training evaluation: student perceptions.

Marjan J B Govaerts1, Cees P M van der Vleuten, Lambert W T Schuwirth, Arno M M Muijtjens.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In health science education clinical clerkships serve the twofold purpose of guiding student learning and assessment of performance. Evidently, both formative and summative assessment procedures are needed in clerkship assessment. In-training evaluation (ITE) has the potential to serve both assessment functions. Implementation of effective ITE, however, has been shown to be problematic, partly because integration of assessment functions may have negative consequences for teaching and learning. This study investigates student perceptions of the impact of an integrated assessment approach, seeking to refine criteria for effective ITE.
METHOD: In the curriculum of Maastricht Midwifery School (MMS), clerkship assessment is based on ITE serving both assessment functions. The ITE model is based on principles of extensive work sampling, and frequent documentation of performance. A focus group technique was used to explore student perceptions on the impact of the ITE approach on student learning and supervisor teaching behaviour, and on the usefulness of information for decision making.
RESULTS: Results indicate that the assessment approach is effective in guidance of student learning. Furthermore, students consider the frequent performance documentation essential in clerkship grading. Acceptance and effectivity of ITE requires a learning environment which is safe and respectful. Transparency of assessment processes is the key to success. Suggestions for improvement focus on variation in evaluation formats, improvement of feedback (narrative, complete) and student involvement in assessment.
CONCLUSION: ITE can fulfill both its formative and summative purposes when some crucial conditions are taken into account. Careful training of both supervisors and students in the use of ITE for student learning and performance measurement is essential.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16193400     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-005-0398-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  8 in total

1.  Workplace-Based Assessment and Assessment for Learning: Threats to Validity.

Authors:  Marjan Govaerts
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13

3.  Which Emergency Medicine Milestone Sub-competencies are Identified Through Narrative Assessments?

Authors:  David Diller; Shannon Cooper; Aarti Jain; Chun Nok Lam; Jeff Riddell
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-20

4.  The power of subjectivity in competency-based assessment.

Authors:  A Virk; A Joshi; R Mahajan; T Singh
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.476

5.  International Council of Ophthalmology-Small Incision Cataract Surgery rubric: A roadmap to evaluate cataract surgical skill acquisition during residency training.

Authors:  Shivani B Jariwala; Priti R Rameshbhai Kapadia; Hiteshree R Patel
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.969

6.  Quality of written narrative feedback and reflection in a modified mini-clinical evaluation exercise: an observational study.

Authors:  Elisabeth A M Pelgrim; Anneke W M Kramer; Henk G A Mokkink; Cees P M Van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Narrative descriptions should replace grades and numerical ratings for clinical performance in medical education in the United States.

Authors:  Janice L Hanson; Adam A Rosenberg; J Lindsey Lane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-21

8.  Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Kelvin H Kramp; Marc J van Det; Nic J G M Veeger; Jean-Pierre E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.