Literature DB >> 16192591

Phase II to III study comparing doxorubicin and docetaxel with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of a Dutch Community Setting Trial for the Clinical Trial Group of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre.

Marijke Bontenbal1, Geert-Jan Creemers, Hans J Braun, Auke C de Boer, Jos Th Janssen, Rieneke B Leys, Jan B Ruit, Swan Hoo Goey, Paul C van der Velden, Leon G Kerkhofs, Kristel L Schothorst, Paul I Schmitz, Hansje J Bokma, Jaap Verweij, Caroline Seynaeve.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 216) were randomly assigned to either AT (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m2) or FAC (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2); both regimens were administered on day 1, every 3 weeks.
RESULTS: A median number of six cycles was delivered in both arms, with a median relative dose-intensity of more than 98%. Median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) were significantly longer for patients on AT compared with FAC (TTP: 8.0 v 6.6 months, respectively; P = .004; and OS: 22.6 v 16.2 months, respectively; P = .019). The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in patients on AT compared with FAC (58% v 37%, respectively; P = .003). The ORR on AT was also higher in patients with visceral disease compared with FAC patients with visceral disease (59% v 36%, respectively; P = .003). There were no differences in grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and infections (AT 89% v FAC 84% and AT 12% v FAC 9%, respectively). Neutropenic fever was more common in AT-treated patients than FAC-treated patients (33% v 9%, respectively; P < .001). Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent in both arms. Congestive heart failure was observed in 3% and 6% of patients on AT and FAC, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In this phase II to III study, AT resulted in a significantly longer TTP and OS and a higher objective ORR than FAC. First-line AT is a valid treatment option for patients with MBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192591     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

Review 1.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Phase II Evaluation of Liposomal Doxorubicin with Docetaxel in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Julie Fasano; Dawn Hershman; Yelena Novik; Benjamin Levinson; Kim Blozie; Amy D Tiersten
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  A literature-based meta-analysis taxane-based doublet versus single-agent taxane chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Bin Xu; Qing Xu; Ling Li
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Evolving options for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: progression-free survival as an endpoint.

Authors:  Sara A Hurvitz
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 5.  Taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Davina Ghersi; Melina L Willson; Matthew Ming Ki Chan; John Simes; Emma Donoghue; Nicholas Wilcken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-10

6.  Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive or/and T3 or T4 breast cancer: clinical outcome (Mansoura University).

Authors:  H Sakr; R H Hamed; A H Anter; T Yossef
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Effects on quality of life of weekly docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: results of a single-centre randomized phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Francesco Nuzzo; Alessandro Morabito; Adriano Gravina; Francesca Di Rella; Gabriella Landi; Carmen Pacilio; Vincenzo Labonia; Emanuela Rossi; Ermelinda De Maio; Maria Carmela Piccirillo; Giuseppe D'Aiuto; Renato Thomas; Massimo Rinaldo; Gerardo Botti; Maurizio Di Bonito; Massimo Di Maio; Ciro Gallo; Francesco Perrone; Andrea de Matteis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Role of taxane and anthracycline combination regimens in the management of advanced breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Ruinian Zheng; Shuai Han; Chongyang Duan; Kexu Chen; Zhijian You; Jun Jia; Shunhuan Lin; Liming Liang; Aixue Liu; Huidong Long; Senming Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The total hospital and community UK costs of managing patients with relapsed breast cancer.

Authors:  R J Thomas; M Williams; C Marshall; J Glen; M Callam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Phase II study of gemcitabine, doxorubicin and paclitaxel (GAT) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a translational research experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Passardi; Ilaria Massa; Wainer Zoli; Lorenzo Gianni; Carlo Milandri; Federica Zumaglini; Oriana Nanni; Roberta Maltoni; Giovanni Luca Frassineti; Dino Amadori
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.