Literature DB >> 16192526

An evaluation of the initial distribution volume of glucose to assess plasma volume during a fluid challenge.

Laurence van Tulder1, Burkhardt Michaeli, René Chioléro, Mette M Berger, Jean-Pierre Revelly.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Circulation blood volume can be estimated with the initial distribution volume of glucose (IDVG) method. In a prospective, observational study, we evaluated the effect of a fluid challenge on IDVG in individual patients. In 13 patients after cardiac surgery, IDVG was determined before and after the infusion of 7 mL/kg hydroxyethyl starch over 30 min. Eleven patients not requiring a fluid challenge served as control. IDVG was computed with a one-compartment exponential model, using plasma glucose concentrations at baseline and 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 min after 5 g of glucose IV bolus. IDVG was repeated 3 times in the control group. IDVG did not change after a fluid challenge (85 +/- 14 versus 93 +/- 14 mL/kg, P = 0.08), and the power of the comparison was 0.25 for a P value of 0.05. The regression coefficient of the exponential fit of glucose versus time was 0.96 +/- 0.03 before, and 0.95 +/- 0.04 after starch infusion (not significant). In the control group, IDVG was 90 +/- 18 mL/kg, and the average individual coefficient of variation was 0.15 +/- 0.08. IDVG seems inadequate to assess individual response to fluid therapy. This limitation may be related to the weak reproducibility of IDVG. IMPLICATIONS: The initial distribution volume of glucose (IDVG) is supposed to reflect effective circulating blood volume. We assessed the sensitivity of this method to a fluid challenge in patients receiving a fluid challenge, and the reproducibility in otherwise stable patients. IDVG was not sensitive to a fluid challenge, and reproducibility was poor. Thus, clinical usefulness of IDVG seems limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192526     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000167769.84459.b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose.

Authors:  Zhiyong He; Hui Qiao; Wei Zhou; Yun Wang; Zhendong Xu; Xuehua Che; Jun Zhang; Weimin Liang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Corrected right ventricular end-diastolic volume and initial distribution volume of glucose correlate with cardiac output after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Junichi Saito; Hironori Ishihara; Eiji Hashiba; Hirobumi Okawa; Tomoyuki Kudo; Masahiro Sawada; Toshihito Tsubo; Kazuyoshi Hirota
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Impact of glucose tolerance status, sex, and body size on glucose absorption patterns during OGTTs.

Authors:  Kristine Færch; Giovanni Pacini; John J Nolan; Torben Hansen; Andrea Tura; Dorte Vistisen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Neither dynamic, static, nor volumetric variables can accurately predict fluid responsiveness early after abdominothoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hironori Ishihara; Eiji Hashiba; Hirobumi Okawa; Junichi Saito; Toshinori Kasai; Toshihito Tsubo
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2013-02-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.