Literature DB >> 16192478

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) for adults with severe sepsis and a low risk of death.

Edward Abraham1, Pierre-François Laterre, Rekha Garg, Howard Levy, Deepak Talwar, Benjamin L Trzaskoma, Bruno François, Jeffrey S Guy, Martina Brückmann, Alvaro Rea-Neto, Rolf Rossaint, Dominique Perrotin, Armin Sablotzki, Nancy Arkins, Barbara G Utterback, William L Macias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In November 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) for adults who had severe sepsis and a high risk of death. The FDA required a study to evaluate the efficacy of DrotAA for adults who had severe sepsis and a low risk of death.
METHODS: We randomly assigned adult patients with severe sepsis and a low risk of death (defined by an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE II] score <25 or single-organ failure) to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo or DrotAA (24 microg per kilogram of body weight per hour) for 96 hours in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The prospectively defined primary end point was death from any cause and was assessed 28 days after the start of the infusion. In-hospital mortality within 90 days after the start of the infusion was measured, and safety information was collected.
RESULTS: Enrollment in the trial was terminated early because of a low likelihood of meeting the prospectively defined objective of demonstrating a significant reduction in the 28-day mortality rate with the use of DrotAA. The study enrolled 2640 patients and collected data on 2613 (1297 in the placebo group and 1316 in the DrotAA group) at the 28-day follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the placebo group and the DrotAA group in 28-day mortality (17.0 percent in the placebo group vs. 18.5 percent in the DrotAA group; P=0.34; relative risk, 1.08; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.28) or in in-hospital mortality (20.5 percent vs. 20.6 percent; P=0.98; relative risk, 1.00; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.16). The rate of serious bleeding was greater in the DrotAA group than in the placebo group during both the infusion (2.4 percent vs. 1.2 percent, P=0.02) and the 28-day study period (3.9 percent vs. 2.2 percent, P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The absence of a beneficial treatment effect, coupled with an increased incidence of serious bleeding complications, indicates that DrotAA should not be used in patients with severe sepsis who are at low risk for death, such as those with single-organ failure or an APACHE II score less than 25. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192478     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa050935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  224 in total

1.  Activated protein C in patients with septic shock: a consecutive case series.

Authors:  Jens A Wagner; Heiner Langenfeld; Luise Klett; Stefan Störk
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-11-27

Review 2.  New antithrombotic drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Weitz; John W Eikelboom; Meyer Michel Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Trial failure prompts soul-searching for critical-care specialists.

Authors:  Elie Dolgin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  The endothelium: physiological functions and role in microcirculatory failure during severe sepsis.

Authors:  H Ait-Oufella; E Maury; S Lehoux; B Guidet; G Offenstadt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  An update on activated protein C (xigris) in the management of sepsis.

Authors:  Cesar Alaniz
Journal:  P T       Date:  2010-09

Review 6.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  Matthijs C Brouwer; Allan R Tunkel; Diederik van de Beek
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Advances in the management of sepsis and the understanding of key immunologic defects.

Authors:  Lee P Skrupky; Paul W Kerby; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Results from the National Sepsis Practice Survey: use of drotrecogin α (activated) and other therapeutic decisions.

Authors:  James M O'Brien; Scott K Aberegg; Naeem A Ali; Gregory B Diette; Stanley Lemeshow
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 9.  Recent advances in nanomedicine for sepsis treatment.

Authors:  Simseok A Yuk; Diego A Sanchez-Rodriguez; Michael D Tsifansky; Yoon Yeo
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2018-05-01

10.  Do-not-resuscitate status and observational comparative effectiveness research in patients with septic shock*.

Authors:  Mark A Bradford; Peter K Lindenauer; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Allan J Walkey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.