Literature DB >> 16192414

Relative index of inequality: definition, estimation, and inference.

Jamie C Sergeant1, David Firth.   

Abstract

The relative index of inequality (RII) is a commonly used measure of the extent to which the occurrence of an outcome such as chronic illness or early death varies with socioeconomic status or some other background variable. The standard RII estimator applies only to linear variation in incidence rates. In this paper a general definition of the RII is introduced, alternative approaches to point estimation are considered, and a parametric bootstrap method is suggested for the construction of approximate confidence intervals. Estimation based on cubic splines fitted by maximum penalized likelihood is developed in some detail, and the proposed approach handles naturally the commonly needed adjustment for a 'standardizing' covariate such as age. Death rates in a large longitudinal study in England and Wales from 1996-2000 are analyzed in order to illustrate the various methods. A small simulation study explores the relative merits of different estimators. The approach based on cubic splines is found to reduce bias substantially, at the expense of some increase in variance, when variation in incidence rates is nonlinear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192414     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  33 in total

1.  Best practice guidelines for monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in health status: lessons from Scotland.

Authors:  John Frank; Sally Haw
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Commentary: long-term monitoring of health inequalities in Scotland--a response to Frank and Haw.

Authors:  Gerry McCartney; Alastair H Leyland; Colin M Fischbacher; Bruce Whyte; David Walsh; Diane L Stockton
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Can changes in the distributions of and associations between education and income bias temporal comparisons of health disparities? An exploration with causal graphs and simulations.

Authors:  Jarvis T Chen; Jason Beckfield; Pamela D Waterman; Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Association of income with symptoms, morbidities and healthcare usage among Japanese adults.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Fukuda; Ayako Hiyoshi
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Hostility may explain the association between depressive mood and mortality: evidence from the French GAZEL cohort study.

Authors:  Cédric Lemogne; Hermann Nabi; Marie Zins; Sylvaine Cordier; Pierre Ducimetière; Marcel Goldberg; Silla M Consoli
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 17.659

6.  Semiparametric regression during 2003-2007.

Authors:  David Ruppert; M P Wand; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 1.125

7.  Exploring the relationship between absolute and relative position and late-life depression: evidence from 10 European countries.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Norman Daniels; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-06-09

8.  Does socioeconomic disparity in cancer incidence vary across racial/ethnic groups?

Authors:  Daixin Yin; Cyllene Morris; Mark Allen; Rosemary Cress; Janet Bates; Lihua Liu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Measurement confounding affects the extent to which verbal IQ explains social gradients in mortality.

Authors:  Benjamin Chapman; Kevin Fiscella; Paul Duberstein; Ichiro Kawachi; Peter Muennig
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Biological and behavioural explanations of social inequalities in coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  M G Marmot; M J Shipley; H Hemingway; J Head; E J Brunner
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.