Literature DB >> 16192341

Slow dynamics of postural sway are in the feedback loop.

Tim Kiemel1, Kelvin S Oie, John J Jeka.   

Abstract

Postural sway is considered to have two fundamental stochastic components, a slow nonoscillatory component and a faster damped-oscillatory component. The slow component has been shown to account for the majority of sway variance during quiet stance. Postural control is generally viewed as a feedback loop in which sway is detected by sensory systems and appropriate motor commands are generated to stabilize the body's orientation. Whereas the mechanistic source for the damped-oscillatory sway component is most likely feedback control of an inverted pendulum, the underlying basis for the slow component is less clear. We investigated whether the slow process was inside or outside the feedback loop by providing standing subjects with sum-of-sines visual motion. Linear stochastic models were fit to the experimental sway trajectories to determine the stochastic structure of sway as well as the transfer function from visual motion to sway. The results supported a fifth-order stochastic model, consisting of a slow process and two damped-oscillatory components. Importantly, the slow process was determined to be inside the feedback loop. This supports the hypothesis that the slow component is due to errors in state estimation because state estimation is inside the feedback loop rather than a moving reference point or an exploratory process outside the feedback loop.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192341      PMCID: PMC2717851          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01144.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  A multisensory integration model of human stance control.

Authors:  H van der Kooij; R Jacobs; B Koopman; H Grootenboer
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Postural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Controlling human upright posture: velocity information is more accurate than position or acceleration.

Authors:  John Jeka; Tim Kiemel; Robert Creath; Fay Horak; Robert Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Comparing internal models of the dynamics of the visual environment.

Authors:  Sean Carver; Tim Kiemel; Herman van der Kooij; John J Jeka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Importance of body sway velocity information in controlling ankle extensor activities during quiet stance.

Authors:  Kei Masani; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Motoki Kouzaki; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Instant equilibrium point and its migration in standing tasks: rambling and trembling components of the stabilogram.

Authors:  V M Zatsiorsky; M Duarte
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.422

8.  Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss.

Authors:  F B Horak; L M Nashner; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Form and exploration of mechanical stability limits in erect stance.

Authors:  G McCollum; T K Leen
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway.

Authors:  R J Peterka; M S Benolken
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  34 in total

1.  The many roles of vision during walking.

Authors:  David Logan; Tim Kiemel; Nadia Dominici; Germana Cappellini; Yuri Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  An Engineering Model of Human Balance Control-Part I: Biomechanical Model.

Authors:  Joseph E Barton; Anindo Roy; John D Sorkin; Mark W Rogers; Richard Macko
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Adaptive changes in postural strategy selection in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Traian Popa; Marco Bonifazi; Raimondo Della Volpe; Alessandro Rossi; Riccardo Mazzocchio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Human control of an inverted pendulum: is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Henrik Gollee; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Visual control of stable and unstable loads: what is the feedback delay and extent of linear time-invariant control?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Stance width changes how sensory feedback is used for multisegmental balance control.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Patricia Mellodge; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A shared neural integrator for human posture control.

Authors:  S E Haggerty; A R Wu; K H Sienko; A D Kuo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Dynamics of inter-modality re-weighting during human postural control.

Authors:  Paula F Polastri; José A Barela; Tim Kiemel; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How visual information links to multijoint coordination during quiet standing.

Authors:  J P Scholz; E Park; J J Jeka; G Schöner; T Kiemel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Identification of the plant for upright stance in humans: multiple movement patterns from a single neural strategy.

Authors:  Tim Kiemel; Alexander J Elahi; John J Jeka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.