Literature DB >> 16191629

Carotenoid availability affects the development of a colour-based mate preference and the sensory bias to which it is genetically linked.

Gregory F Grether1, Gita R Kolluru, F Helen Rodd, Jennifer de la Cerda, Kaori Shimazaki.   

Abstract

Regardless of their origins, mate preferences should, in theory, be shaped by their benefits in a mating context. Here we show that the female preference for carotenoid colouration in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) exhibits a phenotypically plastic response to carotenoid availability, confirming a key prediction of sexual selection theory. Earlier work indicated that this mate preference is genetically linked to, and may be derived from, a sensory bias that occurs in both sexes: attraction to orange objects. The original function of this sensory bias is unknown, but it may help guppies find orange-coloured fruits in the rainforest streams of Trinidad. We show that the sensory bias also exhibits a phenotypically plastic response to carotenoid availability, but only in females. The sex-specificity of this reaction norm argues against the hypothesis that it evolved in a foraging context. We infer instead that the sensory bias has been modified as a correlated effect of selection on the mate preference. These results provide a new type of support for the hypothesis that mate preferences for sexual characters evolve in response to the benefits of mate choice--the alternatives being that such preferences evolve entirely in a non-mating context or in response to the costs of mating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16191629      PMCID: PMC1559943          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution.

Authors:  Y Iwasa; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Carotenoid limitation and mate preference evolution: a test of the indicator hypothesis in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  G F Grether
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Carotenoid scarcity, synthetic pteridine pigments and the evolution of sexual coloration in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  G F Grether; J Hudon; J A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits.

Authors:  D Schluter; T Price
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1993-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions.

Authors:  A L Basolo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata.

Authors:  A E Houde; J A Endler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  18 in total

1.  Female mate preference explains countergradient variation in the sexual coloration of guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Kerry A Deere; Gregory F Grether; Aida Sun; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Seeing orange: prawns tap into a pre-existing sensory bias of the Trinidadian guppy.

Authors:  Alexandra R De Serrano; Cameron J Weadick; Anna C Price; F Helen Rodd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sense and sensitivity: responsiveness to offspring signals varies with the parents' potential to breed again.

Authors:  Rose Thorogood; John G Ewen; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The genetic and evolutionary basis of colour variation in vertebrates.

Authors:  Michael Hofreiter; Torsten Schöneberg
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Artificial selection for food colour preferences.

Authors:  Gemma L Cole; John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Avian retinal oil droplets: dietary manipulation of colour vision?

Authors:  Ben Knott; Mathew L Berg; Eric R Morgan; Katherine L Buchanan; James K Bowmaker; Andrew T D Bennett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Exploring visual plasticity: dietary carotenoids can change color vision in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Benjamin A Sandkam; Kerry A Deere-Machemer; Ashley M Johnson; Gregory F Grether; F Helen Rodd; Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Pterin pigment granules are responsible for both broadband light scattering and wavelength selective absorption in the wing scales of pierid butterflies.

Authors:  Nathan I Morehouse; Peter Vukusic; Ron Rutowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Species-Specific Relationships between Water Transparency and Male Coloration within and between Two Closely Related Lake Victoria Cichlid Species.

Authors:  Ruth F Castillo Cajas; Oliver M Selz; Erwin A P Ripmeester; Ole Seehausen; Martine E Maan
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-19

10.  Sexual display and mate choice in an energetically costly environment.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Bob B M Wong; Robert Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.