Literature DB >> 1619125

The use of static and dynamic vowel cues by multichannel cochlear implant users.

K I Kirk1, N Tye-Murray, R R Hurtig.   

Abstract

Multichannel cochlear implant users vary greatly in their word-recognition abilities. This study examined whether their word recognition was related to the use of either highly dynamic or relatively steady-state vowel cues contained in /bVb/ and /wVb/ syllables. Nine conditions were created containing different combinations of formant transition, steady-state, and duration cues. Because processor strategies differ, the ability to perceive static and dynamic information may depend on the type of cochlear implant used. Ten Nucleus and ten Ineraid subjects participated, along with 12 normal-hearing control subjects. Vowel identification did not differ between implanted groups, but both were significantly poorer at identifying vowels than the normal-hearing group. Vowel identification was best when at least two kinds of cues were available. Using only one type of cue, performance was better with excised vowels containing steady-state formants than in "vowelless" syllables, where the center vocalic portion was deleted and transitions were joined. In the latter syllable type, Nucleus subjects identified vowels significantly better when /b/ was the initial consonant; the other two groups were not affected by specific consonantal context. Cochlear implant subjects' word-recognition was positively correlated with the use of dynamic vowel cues, but not with steady-state cues.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1619125     DOI: 10.1121/1.402838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Catherine L Rogers; Lindsay B Johnson; Soo Hee Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of silent-center syllables by native and non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Catherine L Rogers; Alexandra S Lopez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Ted A Meyer; Adam R Kaiser; Su Wooi Teoh; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Matthew B Winn; Katja Poellmann; Gail S Donaldson
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.