Literature DB >> 1619117

Evaluation of a method of simulating reduced frequency selectivity.

B C Moore1, B R Glasberg, A Simpson.   

Abstract

The accuracy of a method of simulating reduced frequency selectivity by the spectral smearing of complex stimuli has been evaluated. First an excitation pattern that would be evoked by a given nonsmeared stimulus in an impaired ear with broad auditory filters was estimated. Then the spectral smearing of the stimulus that would be necessary to create the same excitation pattern in a normal ear was calculated. The smearing was based on the shapes of simulated broad auditory filters; both symmetric and asymmetric broad filters were simulated. The method was used to process notched noise, and tones in notched noise, and the processed stimuli were used in a series of experiments with normally hearing subjects measuring the threshold for the tone in notched noise. The resulting data were used to derive auditory filter shapes. The derived filter shapes were generally similar to the expected shapes (based on the type of spectral smearing used), but there were some systematic discrepancies and some individual differences. The discrepancies do not seem to be due to the use of information derived from phase locking, since they were observed both at 1 kHz (where phase locking occurs) and at 6 kHz (where phase locking probably does not occurs). The discrepancies also do not seem to be due to the transmission characteristics of the outer/middle ear, since they occurred both when these characteristics were taken into account in the fitting procedure, and when the stimuli were preshaped to compensate for these characteristics. The influence of the subjects' own auditory filters probably can explain some of the discrepancies; the excitation pattern evoked by the spectrally smeared stimuli can be significantly influenced by the subjects' own filters when those filters are not much sharper than the simulated filters used to produce the smeared stimuli. Finally, some of the discrepancies can probably be explained by subjects combining information across auditory filters, rather than just using the single 'best' filter in each condition; this represents a limitation of the fitting procedure rather than of the simulation itself. Overall, the simulation worked reasonably well, especially when the smearing was based on symmetric filters.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1619117     DOI: 10.1121/1.402830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

2.  Real-time contrast enhancement to improve speech recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Rick L Jenison; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Deep band modulated phrase perception in quiet and noise in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Hemanth Narayan Shetty; Vishal Kooknoor
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  Interactive Evaluation of a Music Preprocessing Scheme for Cochlear Implants Based on Spectral Complexity Reduction.

Authors:  Johannes Gauer; Anil Nagathil; Rainer Martin; Jan Peter Thomas; Christiane Völter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Conductive hearing loss during development does not appreciably alter the sharpness of cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Yi Ye; Antje Ihlefeld; Merri J Rosen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.