Literature DB >> 16188947

Factors affecting progression of knee cartilage defects in normal subjects over 2 years.

Y Wang1, C Ding, A E Wluka, S Davis, P R Ebeling, G Jones, F M Cicuttini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cartilage defects are present in subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Although they are often present in healthy subjects, there is little data on the natural history of cartilage defects. The aim of this study was to examine the change in cartilage defects over 2 yr and to identify factors associated with this change.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four healthy subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging of their dominant knee at baseline and follow-up. Cartilage defects were scored (0-4) at five sites. Bone size was determined at medial and lateral tibial plateau and patella. Height, weight, body mass index and physical activity were measured by standard protocols.
RESULTS: Eighty-six subjects completed the study. The mean cartilage defect score of each tibiofemoral compartment increased over time. However, medial and lateral tibiofemoral defect score decreased in 5% of the subjects. Cartilage defects were more likely to progress in males than females in each individual compartment (P<0.001 for medial tibiofemoral, P=0.005 for lateral tibiofemoral and P=0.01 for patellar cartilage). Baseline cartilage defect score was negatively associated with the progression of cartilage defects in each compartment (all P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Although knee cartilage defects progressed over time in the majority of normal subjects, those of the highest severity tended to regress. Male gender and baseline cartilage defect score were the main factors associated with the progression of cartilage defects. Larger studies will be required to identify factors associated with the progression and regression of lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16188947     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  39 in total

1.  Magnitude and regional distribution of cartilage loss associated with grades of joint space narrowing in radiographic osteoarthritis--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

Authors:  F Eckstein; W Wirth; D J Hunter; A Guermazi; C K Kwoh; D R Nelson; O Benichou
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Maximizing cartilage formation and integration via a trajectory-based tissue engineering approach.

Authors:  Matthew B Fisher; Elizabeth A Henning; Nicole B Söegaard; George R Dodge; David R Steinberg; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Anita E Wluka; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Rohit G Jayakar; Natalie L Leong; Michael P Leathers; Riley J Williams; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  An Articular Cartilage Repair Model in Common C57Bl/6 Mice.

Authors:  Masatake Matsuoka; Tomohiro Onodera; Fumio Sasazawa; Daisuke Momma; Rikiya Baba; Kazutoshi Hontani; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.056

6.  Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articular cartilage and subchondral bone health following arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Alasdair R Dempsey; David G Lloyd; Peter M Mills; Tim Wrigley; Kim L Bennell; Ben Metcalf; Fahad Hanna; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Medial-to-lateral ratio of tibiofemoral subchondral bone area is adapted to alignment and mechanical load.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Martin Hudelmaier; September Cahue; Meredith Marshall; Leena Sharma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Novel contrast mechanisms at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Ravinder R Regatte; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Enhancing chondrogenesis and mechanical strength retention in physiologically relevant hydrogels with incorporation of hyaluronic acid and direct loading of TGF-β.

Authors:  Yuhao Deng; Aaron X Sun; Kalon J Overholt; Gary Z Yu; Madalyn R Fritch; Peter G Alexander; He Shen; Rocky S Tuan; Hang Lin
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  A novel in vivo murine model of cartilage regeneration. Age and strain-dependent outcome after joint surface injury.

Authors:  N M Eltawil; C De Bari; P Achan; C Pitzalis; F Dell'accio
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.