AIMS: To assess the relative toxicity of co-proxamol in overdose in comparison to the 2 other paracetamol-opioid combination products, co-codamol and co-dydramol. METHODS: Data collected over a 2-year period (July 2000-June 2002) was used to estimate the frequency of overdose and death for the three most popular paracetamol-opioid compound analgesics. Prescription data for Scotland and Edinburgh, the number of overdoses (derived from overdose admissions in Edinburgh) or Poisons Information Service contacts in Scotland, and national death records were used to calculate a series of indicators relating morbidity (admissions), surrogates of morbidity (poisons enquiries by telephone or internet) and mortality to prescriptions. RESULTS: When related to prescription volume overdoses involving co-proxamol in Scotland were 10 times more likely to be fatal (24.6 (19.7, 30.4)) when compared with co-codamol (2.0 (0.88, 4.0)) or co-dydramol (2.4 (0.5, 7.2)). In contrast there was no difference in the presentation rate or enquiry rates for these analgesics when corrected for prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: The excess hazard from co-proxamol is due to inherent toxicity rather than increased use in overdose. We estimate from this study that withdrawal of co-proxamol would prevent 39 excess deaths per annum in Scotland alone.
AIMS: To assess the relative toxicity of co-proxamol in overdose in comparison to the 2 other paracetamol-opioid combination products, co-codamol and co-dydramol. METHODS: Data collected over a 2-year period (July 2000-June 2002) was used to estimate the frequency of overdose and death for the three most popular paracetamol-opioid compound analgesics. Prescription data for Scotland and Edinburgh, the number of overdoses (derived from overdose admissions in Edinburgh) or Poisons Information Service contacts in Scotland, and national death records were used to calculate a series of indicators relating morbidity (admissions), surrogates of morbidity (poisons enquiries by telephone or internet) and mortality to prescriptions. RESULTS: When related to prescription volume overdoses involving co-proxamol in Scotland were 10 times more likely to be fatal (24.6 (19.7, 30.4)) when compared with co-codamol (2.0 (0.88, 4.0)) or co-dydramol (2.4 (0.5, 7.2)). In contrast there was no difference in the presentation rate or enquiry rates for these analgesics when corrected for prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: The excess hazard from co-proxamol is due to inherent toxicity rather than increased use in overdose. We estimate from this study that withdrawal of co-proxamol would prevent 39 excess deaths per annum in Scotland alone.
Authors: Fakhreddin Taghaddosinejad; Omid Mehrpour; Reza Afshari; Alireza Seghatoleslami; Mohammad Abdollahi; Richard C Dart Journal: J Med Toxicol Date: 2011-09
Authors: Wayne A Ray; Katherine T Murray; Vivian Kawai; David J Graham; William O Cooper; Kathi Hall; Charles Michael Stein Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 2.890