Literature DB >> 16187866

Affective modulation of recognition bias.

R Hans Phaf1, Mark Rotteveel.   

Abstract

A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187866     DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  10 in total

1.  Intact emotion-induced recognition bias in neuropsychological patients with executive control deficits.

Authors:  Sabine Windmann; Till Schneider; Julia Reczio; Martin Grobosch; Volker Voelzke; Valerie Blasius; Andrea Brämer; Werner Ischebeck; Grazyna Janikowski; Winfried Mandrella; Claudia Unger; Larissa Wischnjak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Discriminating between changes in bias and changes in accuracy for recognition memory of emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Rebecca C Grider; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

3.  Distinguishing between attributional and mnemonic sources of familiarity: the case of positive emotion bias.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Laura K Stone; Hannah S Hatch; Simone Schnall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

4.  The effects of face attractiveness on face memory depend on both age of perceiver and age of face.

Authors:  Tian Lin; Håkan Fischer; Marcia K Johnson; Natalie C Ebner
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2019-11-20

5.  Happiness cools the warm glow of familiarity: psychophysiological evidence that mood modulates the familiarity-affect link.

Authors:  Marieke de Vries; Rob W Holland; Troy Chenier; Mark J Starr; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-19

6.  Mental states inside out: switching costs for emotional and nonemotional sentences that differ in internal and external focus.

Authors:  Suzanne Oosterwijk; Piotr Winkielman; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Mark Rotteveel; Agneta H Fischer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

Review 7.  Valuing what happens: a biogenic approach to valence and (potentially) affect.

Authors:  Pamela Lyon; Franz Kuchling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Affective monitoring: a generic mechanism for affect elicitation.

Authors:  R Hans Phaf; Mark Rotteveel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-01

9.  Facial expression at retrieval affects recognition of facial identity.

Authors:  Wenfeng Chen; Chang Hong Liu; Huiyun Li; Ke Tong; Naixin Ren; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-09

10.  Parallel effects of processing fluency and positive affect on familiarity-based recognition decisions for faces.

Authors:  Devin Duke; Chris M Fiacconi; Stefan Köhler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.