Literature DB >> 16187856

Underestimating the duration of future events: memory incorrectly used or memory bias?

Michael M Roy1, Nicholas J S Christenfeld, Craig R M McKenzie.   

Abstract

People frequently underestimate how long it will take them to complete a task. The prevailing view is that during the prediction process, people incorrectly use their memories of how long similar tasks have taken in the past because they take an overly optimistic outlook. A variety of evidence is reviewed in this article that points to a different, although not mutually exclusive, explanation: People base predictions of future duration on their memories of how long past events have taken, but these memories are systematic underestimates of past duration. People appear to underestimate future event duration because they underestimate past event duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187856     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  22 in total

1.  Bias in memory predicts bias in estimation of future task duration.

Authors:  Michael M Roy; Nicholas J S Christenfeld
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

2.  Allocating time to future tasks: the effect of task segmentation on planning fallacy bias.

Authors:  Darryl K Forsyth; Christopher D B Burt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

3.  Effect of task length on remembered and predicted duration.

Authors:  Michael M Roy; Nicholas J S Christenfeld
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

Review 4.  Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2012-11

5.  People Believe That They Are Prototypically Good or Bad.

Authors:  Michael M Roy; Michael J Liersch; Stephen Broomell
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2013-11-01

6.  Not getting lost in translational science: A tool for navigating the pre-implementation phase of multi-site pharmacological clinical trials.

Authors:  Theresa Winhusen
Journal:  Appl Clin Trials       Date:  2014-08

7.  A role for memory in prospective timing informs timing in prospective memory.

Authors:  Emily R Waldum; Lili Sahakyan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-09-17

Review 8.  Time and decision making in humans.

Authors:  Florian Klapproth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  The return trip effect: why the return trip often seems to take less time.

Authors:  Niels van de Ven; Leon van Rijswijk; Michael M Roy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

10.  The influence of perceived causation on judgments of time: an integrative review and implications for decision-making.

Authors:  David Faro; Ann L McGill; Reid Hastie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.