Literature DB >> 16187743

Radiation exposure due to local fallout from Soviet atmospheric nuclear weapons testing in Kazakhstan: solid cancer mortality in the Semipalatinsk historical cohort, 1960-1999.

Susanne Bauer1, Boris I Gusev, Ludmila M Pivina, Kazbek N Apsalikov, Bernd Grosche.   

Abstract

Little information is available on the health effects of exposures to fallout from Soviet nuclear weapons testing and on the combined external and internal environmental exposures that have resulted from these tests. This paper reports the first analysis of the Semipalatinsk historical cohort exposed in the vicinity of the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site, Kazakhstan. The cohort study, which includes 19,545 inhabitants of exposed and comparison villages of the Semipalatinsk region, was set up in the 1960s and comprises 582,750 person-years of follow-up between 1960 and 1999. Cumulative effective radiation dose estimates in this cohort range from 20 mSv to approximately 4 Sv. Rates of mortality and cancer mortality in the exposed group substantially exceeded those of the comparison group. Dose-response analyses within the exposed group confirmed a significant trend with dose for all solid cancers (P < 0.0001) and for digestive and respiratory cancers (P = 0.0255 and P < 0.0001), whereas no consistent dose-response trend was found for all causes of death (P = 0.4296). Regarding specific cancer sites, a significant trend with dose was observed for lung cancer (P = 0.0001), stomach cancer (P = 0.0050), and female breast cancer (P = 0.0040) as well as for esophagus cancer in women (P = 0.0030). The excess relative risk per sievert for all solid cancers combined was 1.77 (1.35; 2.27) based on the total cohort data, yet a selection bias regarding the comparison group could not be entirely ruled out. The excess relative risk per sievert based on the cohort's exposed group was 0.81 (0.46; 1.33) for all solid cancers combined and thus still exceeds current risk estimates from the Life Span Study. Future epidemiological assessments based on this cohort will benefit from extension of follow-up and ongoing validation of dosimetric data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187743     DOI: 10.1667/rr3423.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  19 in total

1.  Are cancer risks associated with exposures to ionising radiation from internal emitters greater than those in the Japanese A-bomb survivors?

Authors:  Mark P Little; Per Hall; Monty W Charles
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Perspective on the use of LNT for radiation protection and risk assessment by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Authors:  Jerome S Puskin
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 4.  Brain tumor epidemiology: consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium.

Authors:  Melissa L Bondy; Michael E Scheurer; Beatrice Malmer; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Faith G Davis; Dora Il'yasova; Carol Kruchko; Bridget J McCarthy; Preetha Rajaraman; Judith A Schwartzbaum; Siegal Sadetzki; Brigitte Schlehofer; Tarik Tihan; Joseph L Wiemels; Margaret Wrensch; Patricia A Buffler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Ultrasound-detected thyroid nodule prevalence and radiation dose from fallout.

Authors:  C E Land; Z Zhumadilov; B I Gusev; M H Hartshorne; P W Wiest; P W Woodward; L A Crooks; N K Luckyanov; C M Fillmore; Z Carr; G Abisheva; H L Beck; A Bouville; J Langer; R Weinstock; K I Gordeev; S Shinkarev; S L Simon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Bioavailable serum estradiol may alter radiation risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Eric J Grant; John B Cologne; Gerald B Sharp; Hidetaka Eguchi; Richard G Stevens; Shizue Izumi; Young-Min Kim; Amy Berrington de González; Waka Ohishi; Kei Nakachi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 7.  The State Scientific Automated Medical Registry, Kazakhstan: an important resource for low-dose radiation health research.

Authors:  K N Apsalikov; A Lipikhina; B Grosche; T Belikhina; E Ostroumova; S Shinkarev; V Stepanenko; T Muldagaliev; S Yoshinaga; T Zhunussova; M Hoshi; H Katayama; D T Lackland; S L Simon; A Kesminiene
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Endothelial dysfunction in rectal cancer patients chronically exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Tolebay Rakhypbekov; Ken Inoue; Laura Pak; Noriyuki Kawano; Nobuo Takeichi; Masaharu Hoshi; Yoshihiro Noso; Nailya Chaizhunusova; Zukhra Manambayeva; Arman Khozhayev; Maulen Molgazhdarov; Sayakhat Olzhaev; Sholpan Tokanova; Madina Madiyeva
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  A reanalysis of curvature in the dose response for cancer and modifications by age at exposure following radiation therapy for benign disease.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A Smith; Ruth A Kleinerman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Is cancer risk of radiation workers larger than expected?

Authors:  P Jacob; W Rühm; L Walsh; M Blettner; G Hammer; H Zeeb
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.