Literature DB >> 16187466

Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts.

Mark J Sagarin1, Erik D Barton, Yi-Mei Chng, Ron M Walls.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We determine success rates of endotracheal intubation performed in emergency departments (EDs) by North American emergency medicine residents.
METHODS: During 58 months, physicians performing intubations at 31 university-affiliated EDs in 3 nations completed a data form that was entered into the National Emergency Airway Registry 2 database. Included were all patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in the ED. The data form included patients' age, sex, weight, indication for intubation, technique of airway management, names and dosages of all medications used to facilitate intubation, level of training and specialty of the intubator, number of attempts, success or failure, and adverse events. We queried this prospectively gathered, observational data to analyze intubations done by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents.
RESULTS: Enrollment was incomplete (eg, 85% at the main study center), so the study sample did not include all consecutive patients. Emergency medicine residents performed 77% (5768/7498; 95% confidence interval [CI] 76% to 78%) of all initial intubation attempts in the United States and Canada. The first intubator was successful in 90% (5,193/5,757; 95% CI 89% to 91%) of cases, including 83% (4,775/5,757; 95% CI 82% to 84%) on the first attempt. Success rates on the first attempt were as follows: postgraduate year 1 = 72% (498/692; 95% CI 68% to 75%), postgraduate year 2 = 82% (2,081/2,544; 95% CI 80% to 83%), postgraduate year 3 = 88% (1,963/2,238; 95% CI 86% to 89%), postgraduate year 4+ = 82% (233/283; 95% CI 77% to 87%), and attending physician = 89% (689/772; 95% CI 87% to 91%). Success rates by the first intubator were as follows: postgraduate year 1 = 80% (553/692; 95% CI 77% to 83%), postgraduate year 2 = 89% (2,272/2,544; 95% CI 88% to 90%), postgraduate year 3 = 94% (2,105/2,238; 95% CI 93% to 95%), postgraduate year 4+ = 93% (263/283; 95% CI 89% to 96%), and attending physician = 98% (755/772; 95% CI 96% to 99%). Rapid sequence intubation technique was used in 78% (4,513/5,768; 95% CI 77% to 79%) of initial attempts: it resulted in 85% (3,843/4,513; 95% CI 84% to 86%) success on the first attempt and 91% (4,117/4,513; 95% CI 90% to 92%) success by the first intubator. The overall rate of cricothyrotomy for all emergency resident intubations was 0.9% (50/5,757; 95% CI 0.6% to 1.1%). When an initial intubator failed, 40% (385/954; 95% CI 37% to 44%) of rescue attempts were performed by emergency medicine residents. Among emergency medicine residents, success on the first rescue attempt was 80% (297/371; 95% CI 76% to 84%), and success by the first rescue intubator was 88% (328/371; 95% CI 85% to 91%).
CONCLUSION: Success of initial intubation attempts increased over the first 3 years of residency. This large multicenter study demonstrates the success of airway management by emergency medicine residents in North America. Using rapid-sequence intubation predominantly, emergency medicine residents achieved high levels of success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187466     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  78 in total

1.  Etomidate in sepsis: understanding the dilemma.

Authors:  David J Gagnon; David B Seder
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Intubation training in emergency medicine: a review of one trainee's first 100 procedures.

Authors:  Matthew J Reed
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Acute airway management.

Authors:  Nikhil Panda; Dean M Donahue
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-03

4.  A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial Examining the Impact of an Emergency Department Mechanical Ventilator Protocol on Clinical Outcomes and Lung-Protective Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Brian M Fuller; Ian T Ferguson; Nicholas M Mohr; Anne M Drewry; Christopher Palmer; Brian T Wessman; Enyo Ablordeppey; Jacob Keeperman; Robert J Stephens; Cristopher C Briscoe; Angelina A Kolomiets; Richard S Hotchkiss; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Impact of an anesthesiology rotation on subsequent endotracheal intubation success.

Authors:  Ted R Clark; Edward J Brizendine; Joseph C Milbrandt; Kevin G Rodgers
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-03

6.  Emergency endotracheal intubation-related adverse events in bronchial asthma exacerbation: can anesthesiologists attenuate the risk?

Authors:  Yuko Ono; Hiroaki Kikuchi; Katsuhiko Hashimoto; Tetsu Sasaki; Jyunya Ishii; Choichiro Tase; Kazuaki Shinohara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  [Systematic analysis of airway registries in emergency medicine].

Authors:  F F Girrbach; F Hilbig; M Michael; M Bernhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 8.  Reducing the burden of acute respiratory distress syndrome: the case for early intervention and the potential role of the emergency department.

Authors:  Brian M Fuller; Nicholas M Mohr; Richard S Hotchkiss; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Mortality after emergency department intubation.

Authors:  Leon D Sanchez; J Scott Goudie; Jennifer De la Pena; Kevin Ban; Jonathan Fisher
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-05-31

10.  Intubation practice patterns in Tuscan emergency departments.

Authors:  Leon D Sanchez; Paolo Di Martino; Matthew Babineau; Michele Lanigra; Kevin M Ban
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.