Literature DB >> 16187188

Development of an instrument to assess and predict satisfaction and poor tolerance among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.

Luis R Peña1, Houssam E Mardini, Nicholas J Nickl.   

Abstract

We aimed to test the reliability of a developed questionnaire that measures and predict aversive endoscopic experience. Two questionnaires (pre- and postprocedure) were given to patients presenting for routine endoscopy. The first questionnaire elicited demographics, prior endoscopic experience, history of drug or alcohol use, patient expectations, and levels of anxiety and nervousness before procedure. After endoscopy, tolerance and willingness to repeat the examination were determined. The primary outcome of "adverse endoscopic experience" (AEE) was defined as a score of > or =5 on the postprocedure overall level of satisfaction or unwillingness to repeat endoscopy. Thirteen of 148 subjects reported an AEE. Items measuring the primary outcome were internally validated by reliability analysis which significantly correlated with measures of aversive experience like pain, nervousness, and suffering during the procedure. Preprocedure factors that were associated with AEE in the univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were nervousness (P = 0.02) and chronic use of psychotropic drugs or alcohol (P = 0.03). In conclusion, we have developed a questionnaire that reliably measures aversive endoscopic experience. Nervousness before procedure and chronic use of psychotropic drugs are reliable predictors of such experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187188     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-005-2952-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  14 in total

1.  The menu of endoscopic sedation: all-you-can-eat, combination set, á la carte, alternative cuisine, or go hungry.

Authors:  R C Wong
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Malpractice. The problem in perspective.

Authors:  J M Vaccarino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-08-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  [Patient's opinion following an upper digestive endoscopy in ambulatory care. Results of a national survey (II)].

Authors:  J M Raymond; P Michel; R Beyssac; E Capdenat; P Couzigou; G Janvier; R Salamon; M Amouretti
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1996

Review 4.  A primer on outcomes research for the gastroenterologist: report of the American Gastroenterological Association task force on outcomes research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy.

Authors:  R F Yacavone; G R Locke; C J Gostout; T H Rockwood; S Thieling; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Analysis of tolerance and complications.

Authors:  C Ciriza; L García; A Fernández; A Díez; M Delgado; A I San Sebastián
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Influence of coping style and precolonoscopy information on pain and anxiety of colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Morgan; L Roufeil; S Kaushik; M Bassett
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: a test of five hypothesis.

Authors:  S Linder-Pelz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Patient suffering and patient satisfaction among the chronically ill.

Authors:  L S Linn; S Greenfield
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Consumer acceptance of prepaid and fee-for-service medical care: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A R Davies; J E Ware; R H Brook; J R Peterson; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  19 in total

1.  Assessment of participant satisfaction with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in South Korea.

Authors:  Hoo-Yeon Lee; Sun Mi Lim; Mi Ah Han; Jae Kwan Jun; Kui Son Choi; Myung-Il Hahm; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Patient satisfaction with the colonoscopy procedure: endoscopists overestimate the importance of adverse physical symptoms.

Authors:  Maaike J Denters; Marije Deutekom; Bert Derkx; Patrick M Bossuyt; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-06

3.  How does tolerability of double balloon enteroscopy compare to other forms of endoscopy?

Authors:  Andrew J Irvine; David S Sanders; Andrew Hopper; Matthew Kurien; Reena Sidhu
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 4.  A literature review of quality in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy from the patient perspective.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Shasha Gong; Catherine Dube; Alan Barkun; Robert Hilsden; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Patient satisfaction with the endoscopy experience and willingness to return in a central Canadian health region.

Authors:  Russell Loftus; Zoann Nugent; Lesley A Graff; Frederick Schumacher; Charles N Bernstein; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Usefulness of applying lidocaine in esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed under sedation with propofol.

Authors:  Felipe de la Morena; Cecilio Santander; Carlos Esteban; Beatriz de Cuenca; Juan Antonio García; Javier Sánchez; Ricardo Moreno
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-05-16

7.  Dexmedetomidine impairs success of patient-controlled sedation in alcoholics during ERCP: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Max Mazanikov; Marianne Udd; Leena Kylänpää; Harri Mustonen; Outi Lindström; Jorma Halttunen; Reino Pöyhiä
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  An instrument to predict endoscopy tolerance: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Luis R Peña; Houssam Mardini; Nicholas Nickl
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  What factors are associated with the difficult-to-sedate endoscopy patient?

Authors:  Bikram S Bal; Michael D Crowell; Divyanshoo R Kohli; Jiana Menendez; Farzin Rashti; Anjali S Kumar; Kevin W Olden
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Does anxiety or waiting time influence patients' tolerance of upper endoscopy?

Authors:  Stefano Pontone; Maya Tonda; Manuela Brighi; Matteo Florio; Daniele Pironi; Paolo Pontone
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.