Literature DB >> 11375575

Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy.

R F Yacavone1, G R Locke, C J Gostout, T H Rockwood, S Thieling, A R Zinsmeister.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A modified Group Health Association of America-9 survey (mGHAA-9) was recently proposed for measurement of patient satisfaction with endoscopy. It is unknown whether the mGHAA-9 addresses the issues most important to this outcome.
METHODS: A 15-item survey of factors potentially important to patient satisfaction with endoscopy was developed, including the 6 core mGHAA-9 items. Respondents were asked to rank the factors from 1 to 15 (1 = most important to l5 = least important to satisfaction). Two groups were surveyed: (1) patients with prior endoscopy experience and (2) physician endoscopists. Item rank distributions overall and by patient age, gender, and procedure experience were examined.
RESULTS: Of 559 outpatients surveyed, 437 (78%) provided complete responses. The mean patient age was 59 years (48.7% female, 45.3% male, 6% not stated). The number 1 ranked factor was the endoscopist's technical skills (median ranking (mr) = 1), an item included in the mGHAA-9. Pain control, a factor not assessed by the mGHAA-9, was second (mr = 4), and ranked number 1 by 16% of patients. Item rankings were consistent across patient subgroups. Relative to patients, endoscopists underprioritized preprocedure and postprocedure communication.
CONCLUSIONS: The mGHAA-9 has inadequate content validity for measurement of patient satisfaction with endoscopy because it does not assess pain control. However, endoscopy satisfaction measurement with a single, universally applied instrument appears feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11375575     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.115337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  28 in total

1.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  A prospective audit of patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale: a cohort of 1,187 patients.

Authors:  Vincent de Jonge; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Eoin A Lalor; Clarence K Wong; Brennan Walters; Anand Bala; Ernst J Kuipers; Monique E van Leerdam; Sander Jo Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  User's perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing quality colonoscopy services in Canada: a study protocol.

Authors:  Gilles Jobin; Marie Pierre Gagnon; Bernard Candas; Catherine Dubé; Anis Ben Abdeljelil; Sonya Grenier
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Development of an instrument to assess and predict satisfaction and poor tolerance among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Luis R Peña; Houssam E Mardini; Nicholas J Nickl
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Assessment of participant satisfaction with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in South Korea.

Authors:  Hoo-Yeon Lee; Sun Mi Lim; Mi Ah Han; Jae Kwan Jun; Kui Son Choi; Myung-Il Hahm; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  A survey of patients' attitudes to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy identifies the value of endoscopist-patient interactive factors.

Authors:  T Hydes; A Yusuf; D S Pearl; T M Trebble
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-04

7.  Patient satisfaction with the colonoscopy procedure: endoscopists overestimate the importance of adverse physical symptoms.

Authors:  Maaike J Denters; Marije Deutekom; Bert Derkx; Patrick M Bossuyt; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-06

Review 8.  A literature review of quality in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy from the patient perspective.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Shasha Gong; Catherine Dube; Alan Barkun; Robert Hilsden; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Patient satisfaction with the endoscopy experience and willingness to return in a central Canadian health region.

Authors:  Russell Loftus; Zoann Nugent; Lesley A Graff; Frederick Schumacher; Charles N Bernstein; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  An instrument to predict endoscopy tolerance: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Luis R Peña; Houssam Mardini; Nicholas Nickl
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.