Literature DB >> 1618694

Efficacy of lung cancer screening; comparison of results from a case-control study and a survival analysis. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group.

T Sobue1, T Suzuki, T Naruke.   

Abstract

A case-control study to evaluate the efficacy of lung cancer screening conducted by us showed that lung cancer screening may reduce the mortality of the disease up to 28%. Assuming this efficacy is unbiased, and that the screening rate is 51.6%, which was observed in the control group in the above study, the number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening in the study period was calculated to be 47 for males and females combined. In the same study population, screen-detected lung cancer patients (N = 207) in the same study period were followed and the 7-year survival rate (46.9%) was compared to the 5-year survival rate (11.3%) obtained by the Osaka Cancer Registry, in which screen-detected lung cancer patients were only 1.8%. The number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening, estimated by the difference in the above two survival rates, was 74 (95% confidence interval; 55-93). The number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening estimated from the case-control study was significantly lower than that estimated from the survival analysis. This indicates that the efficacy of lung cancer screening estimated by the case-control study was within the range that could be explained by the actual long-term survivors among the screen-detected patients in the study population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1618694      PMCID: PMC5918857          DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1992.tb01945.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res        ISSN: 0910-5050


  14 in total

1.  Report on a Workshop of the UICC Project on Evaluation of Screening for Cancer.

Authors:  A B Miller; J Chamberlain; N E Day; M Hakama; P C Prorok
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Case-control studies of screening.

Authors:  S M Moss
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Detection of lung cancer: highlights of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Study in New York City.

Authors:  M R Melamed; B J Flehinger
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1987-09-26

4.  UICC Workshop on the evaluation of screening programmes for cancer.

Authors:  P C Prorok; J Chamberlain; N E Day; M Hakama; A B Miller
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1984-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Estimates of lead time and length bias in a breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  M Shwartz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prevention for multifactorial diseases.

Authors:  S D Walter
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Smoking abstinence and small cell lung cancer survival. An association.

Authors:  A Johnston-Early; M H Cohen; J D Minna; L M Paxton; B E Fossieck; D C Ihde; P A Bunn; M J Matthews; R Makuch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A case-control study for evaluating lung-cancer screening in Japan. Japanese Lung-Cancer-Screening Research Group.

Authors:  T Sobue; T Suzuki; T Naruke
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-01-21       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.

Authors:  R S Fontana; D R Sanderson; L B Woolner; W F Taylor; W E Miller; J R Muhm; P E Bernatz; W S Payne; P C Pairolero; E J Bergstralh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prognostic factors for surgically treated lung adenocarcinoma patients, with special reference to smoking habit.

Authors:  T Sobue; T Suzuki; I Fujimoto; O Doi; R Tateishi; T Sato
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1991-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.