Literature DB >> 2066205

Case-control studies of screening.

S M Moss1.   

Abstract

The application of case-control studies to the evaluation of screening data presents a number of potential problems. In particular, the results are liable to be affected by selection bias. Published case-control studies of breast cancer screening are reviewed in the light of the results of a recent UK study of somewhat different design which attempts to estimate the effect of selection bias. Case-control studies of cervical screening involve additional difficulties, such as the handling of cases of invasive disease diagnosed by screening, and the distinction between diagnostic and screening smears. The extent to which published studies have addressed these is discussed. It is concluded that case-control studies of screening should be interpreted with caution, particularly in situations where comparable data from controlled trials are not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2066205     DOI: 10.1093/ije/20.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  13 in total

1.  Cervical screening.

Authors:  Angela E Raffle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-29

2.  Risk factors in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  L J Whalley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-16

Review 3.  Mammographic screening in older women. Is it worthwhile?

Authors:  J A van Dijck; M J Broeders; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  A study on the efficacy of a screening program for colorectal cancer in a small Japanese village.

Authors:  H Nakama
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1994-01

5.  Stomach cancer mortality in Spain: an ecological analysis of diet, altitude, latitude, and income.

Authors:  J Vioque; C M Egea; M Porta
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Quantifying lead-time bias in risk factor studies of cancer through simulation.

Authors:  Rick J Jansen; Bruce H Alexander; Kristin E Anderson; Timothy R Church
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 7.  The role of cancer registries in cancer control.

Authors:  Donald Maxwell Parkin
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Population based randomized study of uptake and yield of screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with screening by faecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  J E Verne; R Aubrey; S B Love; I C Talbot; J M Northover
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-18

9.  Increasingly strong reduction in breast cancer mortality due to screening.

Authors:  G van Schoor; S M Moss; J D M Otten; R Donders; E Paap; G J den Heeten; R Holland; M J M Broeders; A L M Verbeek
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Case-control study of gastric cancer screening in Venezuela.

Authors:  P Pisani; W E Oliver; D M Parkin; N Alvarez; J Vivas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.