Literature DB >> 16186605

Viewpoint: professional integrity in industry-sponsored clinical trials.

Franklin G Miller1, Howard Brody.   

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) relies on accurate data derived from well-designed, clinically relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most randomized trials, however, are conducted by industry sponsors aiming at licensing and marketing drugs, which may weaken the usefulness of the findings to EBM. Disturbing evidence has emerged of widespread biases in industry-sponsored trials, including publication bias, selective reporting of findings, and distorted interpretation of results. These practices compromise the professional integrity of physician-investigators who contribute to them. In turn, the well-being of patients participating in RCTs may be jeopardized, and the evidence base upon which EBM is practiced may be corrupted. Regulatory reform alone will be inadequate to resolve these problems; attention must also be paid to physicians' professionalism. The authors recommend a change in the culture of academic medicine whereby physician-investigators who maintain professional integrity are rewarded or recognized. Educational interventions promoting integrity in clinical research may be one part of affecting such change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16186605     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200510000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  8 in total

1.  Academia and the company coin.

Authors:  Jim Kling
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  The ethics of changing practice: do we cross the line?

Authors:  Alan F Merry
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-12

3.  Citizen expectations of 'academic entrepreneurship' in health research: public science, practical benefit.

Authors:  Fiona A Miller; Michael Painter-Main; Renata Axler; Pascale Lehoux; Mita Giacomini; Barbara Slater
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Ethics of clinical research with mentally ill persons.

Authors:  Hanfried Helmchen
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 5.  OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Design and conduct of clinical trials of surgical interventions for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J N Katz; E Losina; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Funding source and research report quality in nutrition practice-related research.

Authors:  Esther F Myers; J Scott Parrott; Deborah S Cummins; Patricia Splett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Analysis of Sponsors/Collaborators of 69,160 Drug Trials Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Shruthi Muralidharan Keezhupalat; Ankeet Naik; Saurabh Gupta; Raghunathan Srivatsan; Gayatri Saberwal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The institutional workers of biomedical science: Legitimizing academic entrepreneurship and obscuring conflicts of interest.

Authors:  Renata E Axler; Fiona A Miller; Pascale Lehoux; Trudo Lemmens
Journal:  Sci Public Policy       Date:  2017-11-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.