Literature DB >> 16185869

Management of women at high risk for breast cancer: new imaging beyond mammography.

C K Kuhl1, W Kuhn, H Schild.   

Abstract

The management of women with an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer is a difficult task. This is especially true for women with a documented mutation in a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA), and also for those who tested negative for a mutation, but have a family history that is suggestive of familial breast cancer. Primary prevention by prophylactic mastectomy has been shown to reduce breast cancer incidence in these women, but this intervention is still not considered a "first-line" option in the majority of guidelines. Instead, secondary prevention (intensified surveillance) is recommended. However, due to the early onset of familial breast cancer, screening must start at a substantially younger age than in women at average risk. This, together with the fact that familial breast cancers may differ from sporadic cancers in many aspects, will have a significant impact on the design and on the success rates of surveillance protocols. This article describes the different management options that exist for women at increased genetic risk and provides a survey of the current evidence regarding mammographic and non-mammographic imaging techniques. The conclusion is that mammographic screening, with or without concomitant ultrasound and clinical breast examination, is probably not sufficient to ensure an early diagnosis of familial breast cancer. If MRI is integrated in surveillance programs, early diagnosis seems to be possible. Still, the efficacy of screening even with MRI is unclear in terms of morbidity and mortality, and this lack of evidence must be communicated to women at high genetic risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16185869     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  10 in total

1.  Breast MRI at 3.0 T in a high-risk familial breast cancer screening cohort: comparison with 1.5 T screening studies.

Authors:  M D Pickles; L W Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  PAM50 and Risk of Recurrence Scores for Interval Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Samantha Puvanesarajah; Sarah J Nyante; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Mengjie Chen; Chiu-Kit Tse; Xuezheng Sun; Emma H Allott; Erin L Kirk; Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Andrew F Olshan; Louise M Henderson; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2018-04-05

Review 3.  Molecular screening for breast cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment planning: combining biomarkers from DNA, RNA, and protein.

Authors:  Katherine Stemke-Hale; Bryan Hennessy; Gordon B Mills; Rahul Mitra
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Relationship between DCE-MRI morphological and functional features and histopathological characteristics of breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Montemurro; Laura Martincich; Ivana Sarotto; Ilaria Bertotto; Riccardo Ponzone; Lisa Cellini; Stefania Redana; Piero Sismondi; Massimo Aglietta; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Imaging of the adolescent breast.

Authors:  Katie N Jones
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 6.  Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Jennifer S Drukteinis; Blaise P Mooney; Chris I Flowers; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Analysis of mammographic diagnostic errors in breast clinic.

Authors:  V Palazzetti; F Guidi; L Ottaviani; G Valeri; S Baldassarre; G M Giuseppetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples.

Authors:  Avice M O'Connell; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 9.  Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 6.514

10.  Breast cancer screening in women at increased risk according to different family histories: an update of the Modena Study Group experience.

Authors:  Laura Cortesi; Daniela Turchetti; Isabella Marchi; Antonella Fracca; Barbara Canossi; Battista Rachele; Ruscelli Silvia; Pecchi Anna Rita; Torricelli Pietro; Federico Massimo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.