Literature DB >> 16185840

Acoustic signal typing for evaluation of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech.

Corina J van As-Brooks1, Florien J Koopmans-van Beinum, Louis C W Pols, Frans J M Hilgers.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Because of the aperiodicity of many tracheoesophageal voices, acoustic analysis of the tracheoesophageal voice is less straightforward than that of the normal voice. This study presents the development and testing of an acoustic signal typing system based on visual inspection of a narrow-band spectrogram that can be used by researchers for classification of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech. In addition to this classification system, a selection of acoustic measures [median fundamental frequency, standard deviation of fundamental frequency, jitter, percentage of voiced (%Voiced), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), glottal-to-noise excitation (GNE) ratio, and band energy difference (BED)] was computed to provide more insight into the acoustic components of tracheoesophageal voice quality. For clinical relevance, relationships between the acoustic signal types and an overall judgment of the voice were investigated as well. Results showed that the four acoustic signal types form a good basis for performing more acoustic analyses and give a good impression of the overall quality of the voice.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16185840     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  8 in total

1.  Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  Kathy F Nagle; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Voice quality and surgical detail in post-laryngectomy tracheoesophageal speakers.

Authors:  I Jacobi; A J Timmermans; F J M Hilgers; M W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Nonlinear dynamic-based analysis of severe dysphonia in patients with vocal fold scar and sulcus vocalis.

Authors:  Seong Hee Choi; Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang; Diane M Bless; Nathan V Welham
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Chaos Behavior Analysis of Alaryngeal Voices Including Esophageal (SE) and Tracheoesophageal (TE) Voices.

Authors:  Boquan Liu; Fan Zhang; Ling Chen; Matthew A Silverman; Hengxin Liu; Dehui Fu; Yongwang Huang; Jing Pan; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.391

Review 5.  Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaske E van Sluis; Lisette van der Molen; Rob J J H van Son; Frans J M Hilgers; Patrick A Bhairosing; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The relationship between biomechanics of pharyngoesophageal segment and tracheoesophageal phonation.

Authors:  Teng Zhang; Ian Cook; Michał Szczęśniak; Julia Maclean; Peter Wu; Duong Duy Nguyen; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Voice quality after transoral CO2 laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Andrea Colizza; Massimo Ralli; Chiara D'Elia; Antonio Greco; Marco de Vincentiis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.236

8.  Acoustic vocal measures in women without voice complaints and with normal larynxes.

Authors:  Leila Susana Finger; Carla Aparecida Cielo; Karine Schwarz
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 May-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.