Literature DB >> 16185119

The learning curve associated with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Stephen S Kim1, Stanley T Lau, Steven L Lee, John H T Waldhausen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LPM) for the treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) has gained popularity in recent years. This study examines the learning curve associated with LPM.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LPM at a children's hospital between January 1, 1997 and June 30, 2003. Data including age, weight, complications, operative time, time to feeding, and length of postoperative stay were analyzed using the Student's ttest.
RESULTS: A total of 51 patients underwent LPM during the study period. Patient characteristics were similar throughout the study period. Operative time ranged from 12 to 55 minutes (mean, 25 minutes). Mean operative time decreased significantly from 31+/-11 minutes for the first 15 patients, to 25+/-6 minutes for the second 15 patients, to 20+/-7 minutes for the last 15 patients (P<0.05). Operative times were erratic for the early cases but became more consistent over time, especially after 30 cases. Conversion to an open procedure was required in two patients. Complications included an umbilical port site wound dehiscence and readmission for persistent vomiting. There were no mucosal perforations. Time to ad lib feeding and postoperative length of stay did not change over time.
CONCLUSION: LPM has a steep learning curve, especially for the first 15 patients. Operative time decreases and becomes more consistent after about 30 cases. Despite the learning curve, LPM can be performed safely and effectively without an increase in complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16185119     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

1.  Single-incision pediatric Endosurgical (SIPES) versus conventional laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is both safe and effective in a district hospital.

Authors:  Abdulmajid Ali; Gopi Tripuraneni; Subramanian Velmurugan; Audun Sigurdsson; John Lotz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Cross-technique for single-incision pediatric endosurgical pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Oliver J Muensterer; Albert J Chong; Keith E Georgeson; Carroll M Harmon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb; Casey M Calkins; J Patrick Murphy; Walter S Andrews; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder; Daniel J Ostlie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Learning curves for pediatric laparoscopy: how many operations are enough? The Amsterdam experience with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  M W N Oomen; L T Hoekstra; R Bakx; H A Heij
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Use of ultrasound measurements to direct laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in infants.

Authors:  Denis D Bensard; Richard J Hendrickson; Kathy S Clark; Katie J Giesting; Evan R Kokoska
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: Lessons learnt in our first 101 cases.

Authors:  Abhilasha Tej Handu; Vinay Jadhav; J Deepak; Jayalaxmi S Aihole; M Narendrababu; S Ramesh; Kr Srimurthy
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.