Literature DB >> 16184335

Comparing grazing on lake seston by Dreissena and Daphnia: lessons for biomanipulation.

L M Dionisio Pires1, B W Ibelings, M Brehm, E Van Donk.   

Abstract

Biomanipulation measures in lakes, taken to diminish algal blooms, have mainly been restricted to the reduction of zooplanktivorous fish with the aim to stimulate the grazing pressure by native filter feeders such as Daphnia. However, larger filter feeders like the exotic zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, have been suggested as an optional tool because of their high filtering capacity. We compared grazing by two filter feeders, D. polymorpha and Daphnia galeata, offered seston from Lake IJsselmeer, the Netherlands in two consecutive years: 2002 and 2003. The seston in both years was dominated by the colony-forming cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. The grazing studies were performed under controlled conditions in the laboratory and samples were analyzed on a flow cytometer, making it possible to quantify grazing on different seston components and size fractions, including cyanobacteria, other phytoplankton (green algae, diatoms, etc.), and detritus. No differences in clearance rates, on a per weight basis, were found between the two grazer species. The clearance rate on cyanobacteria (especially <20 microm) was lower in 2003 than in 2002. In 2003, the microcystin concentration of cyanobacteria was higher than in 2002, suggesting that the observed lower clearance rate in 2003 was due to the enhanced toxin content of the cyanobacteria. Zebra mussels, although indiscriminately filtering all seston groups out of the water, positively selected for phytoplankton in their mantle cavity, irrespective of its toxicity, and rejected detritus. Since no differences in clearance rates were found between the two grazer species, we conclude that for biomanipulation purposes of shallow lakes, native species like the daphnids should be preferred over exotic species like zebra mussels. When the seston is dominated by phytoplankton that cannot be filtered out of the water column by Daphnia, however, the use of zebra mussels may be considered. Care should be taken, however, in the choice of the lakes since the mussels may have severe ecological and economic impacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16184335     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-004-0147-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  10 in total

1.  Accumulation of cyanobacterial hepatotoxins by Daphnia in some Egyptian irrigation canals.

Authors:  Z A Mohamed
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Immuno-crossreactivity and toxicity assessment of conjugation products of the cyanobacterial toxin, microcystin-LR.

Authors:  J S Metcalf; K A Beattie; S Pflugmacher; G A Codd
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Biochemical characterization of microcystin toxicity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  F Tencalla; D Dietrich
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Identification of an enzymatically formed glutathione conjugate of the cyanobacterial hepatotoxin microcystin-LR: the first step of detoxication.

Authors:  S Pflugmacher; C Wiegand; A Oberemm; K A Beattie; E Krause; G A Codd; C E Steinberg
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1998-11-27

5.  Plasticity in filtering screens of Daphnia cucullata×galeata hybrids and parental species at two food concentrations.

Authors:  Sari Repka; Sárka Veselá; Anke Weber; Klaus Schwenk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Distribution and aspects of population dynamics of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771), in the lake IJsselmeer area (The Netherlands).

Authors:  Abraham Bij de Vaate
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Extraction and high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of microcystins in raw and treated waters.

Authors:  L A Lawton; C Edwards; G A Codd
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  Distribution of microcystins in a lake foodweb: no evidence for biomagnification.

Authors:  B W Ibelings; K Bruning; J de Jonge; K Wolfstein; L M Dionisio Pires; J Postma; T Burger
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: Filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity.

Authors:  Walter Geller; Helga Müller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Assimilation and depuration of microcystin-LR by the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha.

Authors:  L M Dionisio Pires; K M Karlsson; J A O Meriluoto; E Kardinaal; P M Visser; K Siewertsen; E Van Donk; B W Ibelings
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 4.964

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Physiological Response of the Freshwater Mussel Unio douglasiae in Microcystis aeruginosa Bloom Waters.

Authors:  Zhun Li; Young-Hyo Kim; David C Aldridge; Baik-Ho Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  A global synthesis of ecosystem services provided and disrupted by freshwater bivalve molluscs.

Authors:  Alexandra Zieritz; Ronaldo Sousa; David C Aldridge; Karel Douda; Eduardo Esteves; Noé Ferreira-Rodríguez; Jon H Mageroy; Daniele Nizzoli; Martin Osterling; Joaquim Reis; Nicoletta Riccardi; Daniel Daill; Clemens Gumpinger; Ana Sofia Vaz
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Physiological and Metabolic Responses of Marine Mussels Exposed to Toxic Cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa and Chrysosporum ovalisporum.

Authors:  Flavio Oliveira; Leticia Diez-Quijada; Maria V Turkina; João Morais; Aldo Barreiro Felpeto; Joana Azevedo; Angeles Jos; Ana M Camean; Vitor Vasconcelos; José Carlos Martins; Alexandre Campos
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.