Literature DB >> 12650347

Bt sweet corn and selective insecticides: impacts on pests and predators.

Fred R Musser1, Anthony M Shelton.   

Abstract

Sweet corn, Zea mays L., is attacked by a variety of insect pests that can cause severe losses to the producer. Current control practices are largely limited to the application of broad-spectrum insecticides that can have a substantial and deleterious impact on the natural enemy complex. Predators have been shown to provide partial control of sweet corn pests when not killed by broad-spectrum insecticides. New products that specifically target the pest species, while being relatively benign to other insects, could provide more integrated control. In field trials we found that transgenic Bt sweet corn, and the foliar insecticides indoxacarb and spinosad are all less toxic to the most abundant predators in sweet corn (Coleomegilla maculate [DeGeer], Harmonia axyridis [Pallas], and Orius insidiosus [Sav]) than the pyrethroid lambda cyhalothrin. Indoxacarb, however, was moderately toxic to coccinellids and spinosad and indoxacarb were somewhat toxic to O. insidiosus nymphs at field rates. Bt sweet corn and spinosad were able to provide control of the lepidopteran pests better than or equal to lambda cyhalothrin. The choice of insecticide material made a significant impact on survival of the pests and predators, while the frequency of application mainly affected the pests and the rate applied had little effect on either pests or predators. These results demonstrate that some of the new products available in sweet corn allow a truly integrated biological and chemical pest control program in sweet corn, making future advances in conservation, augmentation and classical biological control more feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12650347     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-96.1.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biological control and sustainable food production.

Authors:  J S Bale; J C van Lenteren; F Bigler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?

Authors:  Vassili V Velkov; Alexander B Medvinsky; Mikhail S Sokolov; Anatoly I Marchenko
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 3.  Six years after the commercial introduction of Bt maize in Spain: field evaluation, impact and future prospects.

Authors:  Matilde Eizaguirre; Ramon Albajes; Carmen López; Jordi Eras; Belén Lumbierres; Xavier Pons
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Effect of insecticide regimens on biological control of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris, by Peristenus spp. in New York State apple orchards.

Authors:  Lora A Crampton; Greg M Loeb; Kim A Hoelmer; Michael P Hoffmann
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

Review 5.  The multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis: a review of its biology, uses in biological control, and non-target impacts.

Authors:  R L Koch
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 1.857

6.  Reference gene selection for RT-qPCR analysis in Harmonia axyridis, a global invasive lady beetle.

Authors:  Xiaowei Yang; Huipeng Pan; Ling Yuan; Xuguo Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified?

Authors:  Agnès Ricroch; Jean Baptiste Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Laboratory toxicity studies demonstrate no adverse effects of Cry1Ab and Cry3Bb1 to larvae of Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): the importance of study design.

Authors:  Fernando Alvarez-Alfageme; Franz Bigler; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Bt crop effects on functional guilds of non-target arthropods: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  L LaReesa Wolfenbarger; Steven E Naranjo; Jonathan G Lundgren; Royce J Bitzer; Lidia S Watrud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A statistical simulation model for field testing of non-target organisms in environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants.

Authors:  Paul W Goedhart; Hilko van der Voet; Ferdinando Baldacchino; Salvatore Arpaia
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.