Literature DB >> 16183689

Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without post-test referral bias.

Poul F Høilund-Carlsen1, Allan Johansen, Henrik Wulff Christensen, Werner Vach, Mette Møldrup, Peter Bartram, Annegrete Veje, Torben Haghfelt.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) as gatekeeper for coronary angiography and revascularization in stable angina pectoris. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A prospective series of 507 out of 972 adult patients referred to coronary angiography for known or suspected stable angina pectoris underwent clinical examination followed immediately by MPS, the result of which was not communicated. MPS showed normal perfusion in 258/507 (51%) patients, reversible defects in 201/507 (40%), and fixed defects in 48/507 (9%). Of 168 revascularized patients, 27 (16%) had normal perfusion and 13 (8%) had fixed defects. Coronary angiography was undertaken in 476 patients of whom 252 (53%) had normal findings or insignificant stenoses. The same was the case in 361 (41%) out of the 883 of the 972 consecutive patients, who had this examination. Assuming that the true rate of normal perfusion in the entire series was correspondingly lower, 48% of catheterizations and 19% of revascularizations were superfluous.
CONCLUSION: The use of MPS as gatekeeper appears to make about half of catheterizations and almost one-fifth of revascularizations redundant. Even in high-risk groups, substantial savings are possible, and the risk of overlooking patients with severe disease seems negligible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16183689     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  18 in total

1.  A normal stress SPECT scan is an effective gatekeeper for coronary angiography.

Authors:  Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; James J Milavetz; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Role of cardiac computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: interaction with nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seiji Tomiguchi; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-12-25

3.  Angina pectoris: has the cornerstone of symptomatic coronary artery disease been moved?

Authors:  Renee C Hessian; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Clinical implication of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as potential gatekeeper prior to invasive examination in patients with AHA/ACC class II indication for coronary angiography.

Authors:  Guenter Pilz; Peter Bernhardt; Markus Klos; Eman Ali; Michael Wild; Berthold Höfling
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Nuclear cardiology in the literature.

Authors:  Kenneth A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Coronary calcium score influences referral for invasive coronary angiography after normal myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Shu Yokota; Mohamed Mouden; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Elsemiek Engbers; Pieter L Jager; Jorik R Timmer; Siert Knollema
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: an assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group.

Authors:  A H Gershlick; M de Belder; J Chambers; D Hackett; R Keal; A Kelion; S Neubauer; D J Pennell; M Rothman; M Signy; P Wilde
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Prevalence, location, and extent of significant coronary artery disease in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shu Yokota; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Jorik R Timmer; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  High probability of disease in angina pectoris patients: is clinical estimation reliable?

Authors:  Poul F Høilund-Carlsen; Allan Johansen; Werner Vach; Henrik Wulff Christensen; Mette Møldrup; Torben Haghfelt
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  Reduction in downstream test utilization following introduction of coronary computed tomography in a cardiology practice.

Authors:  Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.