Literature DB >> 16183129

Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.

Jorge Alió1, José Luis Rodríguez-Prats, Ahmed Galal, Mohamed Ramzy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of microincision cataract surgery (MICS) with coaxial phacoemulsification.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eyes of 50 patients with nuclear or corticonuclear cataract (grades 2+ to 4) with Lens Opacities Classification System III.
METHODS: One hundred eyes (50 patients) were randomly operated through clear corneal incisions using 2 techniques: coaxial phacoemulsification (50 eyes) and microincision cataract surgery (50 eyes). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean phacoemulsification time, total phacoemulsification percent, effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) (calculated by multiplying total phacoemulsification time in seconds by the average power percent used), intraoperative total balanced salt solution (BSS) volume, visual outcome, vectorial astigmatic changes, corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, and anterior chamber flare and cells preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between MICS and coaxial phacoemulsification regarding mean incision size, mean total phacoemulsification percent, and EPT. There were no significant differences between the techniques regarding the mean percent of endothelial cell loss, anterior chamber cell count and flare, mean phacoemulsification time, pachymetric measures or total BSS volume utilized, or visual outcome. The vectorial astigmatic changes in the MICS group showed a change of < or =0.25 diopters (D) in 35% of the eyes, 0.25 to 0.5 D in 50% of the eyes, and 0.5 to 1.0 D in 15% of the eyes. These changes were induced by the surgery. Vectorial astigmatic changes of >1 D were not observed. In the coaxial phacoemulsification group, vectorial astigmatic changes of <0.25 D were not observed either. Changes of 0.25 to 0.5 D were seen in 20% of the eyes, and changes of 0.5 to 1.0 D were seen in 30%. Fifty percent of the eyes showed changes of >1.0 D. Mean vectorial astigmatic changes were 0.36+/-0.23 D in the MICS group and 1.2+/-0.74 D in the coaxial phacoemulsification group (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Microincision cataract surgery significantly lowered mean phacoemulsification time, mean total phacoemulsification percent, mean EPT, and surgically induced astigmatism when compared with coaxial phacoemulsification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16183129     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  31 in total

1.  Astigmatic equivalence of 2.2-mm and 1.8-mm superior clear corneal cataract incision.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Febbraro; Li Wang; Edmondo Borasio; Lorenzo Richiardi; Hamza N Khan; Alain Saad; Damien Gatinel; Douglas D Koch
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Influence of anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, axial length, and lens density on postoperative endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Anna Reuschel; Holger Bogatsch; Nicole Oertel; Renate Wiedemann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Microincision intraocular lens with plate haptic design. Evaluation of rotational stability and centering of a microincision intraocular lens with plate haptic design in 12-19 months of follow-up].

Authors:  W Wehner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Clinical evaluation of surgery-induced astigmatism in cataract surgery using 2.2 mm or 1.8 mm clear corneal micro-incisions.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Xiu Wang; Hong Zhang; Yi Pang; Rui-Hua Wei
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Comparative analysis of coaxial phacoemulsification with 2.2- and 2.8-mm clear corneal incisions.

Authors:  Harinder Singh Sethi; Komal Saluja; Mayuresh P Naik
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Uncorrected visual acuity in the immediate postoperative period following uncomplicated cataract surgery: bimanual microincision cataract surgery versus standard coaxial phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Ayman Saeed; Jeremy O'Connor; Geraldine Cunnife; Jim Stack; Mark G Mullhern; Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Bimanual microincisional cataract surgery technique and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al-Muammar
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-05

8.  [Aberration corrected intraocular lens for microincision cataract surgery (MICS). Intraindividual comparison with a conventional lens - 1-year follow-up].

Authors:  M Möglich; H Häberle; D T Pham; C Wirbelauer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  [First results with a new aberration correcting bifocal intraocular lens].

Authors:  H Kaymak; U Mester
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 10.  [The basics of refractive lens exchange].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.