Literature DB >> 16182233

Toward a theoretical approach to medical error reporting system research and design.

Ben-Tzion Karsh1, Kamisha Hamilton Escoto2, John W Beasley3, Richard J Holden2.   

Abstract

The release of the Institute of Medicine (Kohn et al., 2000) report "To Err is Human", brought attention to the problem of medical errors, which led to a concerted effort to study and design medical error reporting systems for the purpose of capturing and analyzing error data so that safety interventions could be designed. However, to make real gains in the efficacy of medical error or event reporting systems, it is necessary to begin developing a theory of reporting systems adoption and use and to understand how existing theories may play a role in explaining adoption and use. This paper presents the results of a 9-month study exploring the barriers and facilitators for the design of a statewide medical error reporting system and discusses how several existing theories of technology acceptance, adoption and implementation fit with many of the results. In addition we present an integrated theoretical model of medical error reporting system design and implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182233      PMCID: PMC4160100          DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.940


  25 in total

Review 1.  Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems.

Authors:  P Barach; S D Small
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Patient safety efforts should focus on medical errors.

Authors:  Robert A McNutt; Richard Abrams; David C Arons
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Patient safety efforts should focus on medical injuries.

Authors:  Peter M Layde; Leslie M Cortes; Stephen P Teret; Karen J Brasel; Evelyn M Kuhn; James A Mercy; Stephen W Hargarten; Leslie A Maas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Reporting of adverse events.

Authors:  Lucian L Leape
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Multiple user considerations and their implications in medical error reporting system design.

Authors:  Kamisha Hamilton Escoto; Ben-Tzion Karsh; John W Beasley
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.

Authors:  L L Leape; T A Brennan; N Laird; A G Lawthers; A R Localio; B A Barnes; L Hebert; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Nurses' views on reporting medication incidents.

Authors:  S B Walker; M J Lowe
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.066

8.  Perceived barriers in reporting medication administration errors.

Authors:  D S Wakefield; B J Wakefield; T Uden-Holman; M A Blegen
Journal:  Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

9.  A physician-based voluntary reporting system for adverse events and medical errors.

Authors:  S N Weingart; L D Callanan; A N Ship; M D Aronson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach.

Authors:  M Berg
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.046

View more
  23 in total

1.  Willingness to Report Medical Incidents in Healthcare: a Psychological Model Based on Organizational Trust and Benefit/Risk Perceptions.

Authors:  Xiaosong Zhao; Shumeng Zhao; Na Liu; Peng Liu
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Testing the Electronic Personal Health Record Acceptance Model by Nurses for Managing Their Own Health: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  K Gartrell; A M Trinkoff; C L Storr; M L Wilson; A P Gurses
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  An Investigation of Pharmacists' Acceptance of NHI-PharmaCloud in Taiwan.

Authors:  Meng-Chi Liu; Ching-Chang Lee
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Occupational Macroergonomics: Principles, Scope, Value, and Methods.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; A Joy Rivera; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  IIE Trans Occup       Date:  2015-04-28

5.  Understanding the factors influencing doctors' intentions to report patient safety concerns: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Antonia Rich; Rowena Viney; Ann Griffin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  That's nice, but what does IT do? Evaluating the impact of bar coded medication administration by measuring changes in the process of care.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Roger L Brown; Samuel J Alper; Matthew C Scanlon; Neal R Patel; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.656

Review 7.  Patient Safety Learning Systems: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of reporting of clinical adverse events scale (C-RoCAES).

Authors:  Xiao Sun; Yan Shi; Shuying Zhang; Meimei Tian; Yafen Mao; Qian Wu; Xiaoping Zhu; Meifang Gong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 9.  The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Macroergonomics in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ayse P Gurses; Richard Holden; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Enid Montague; Joy Rodriguez; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.