OBJECTIVE: To describe a consent-based Patient Research Registry designed to improve the quality and efficiency of cognitive rehabilitation research by balancing patients' privacy rights with researchers' need for access to research participants. DESIGN: Description of a protocol for a Patient Research Registry. SETTING: Three rehabilitation hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the 3 participating hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentages of eligible patients with stroke or TBI who consented to be enrolled in the Registry, were subsequently contacted about a study, and ultimately participated in a study. A survey examined satisfaction with the Registry among researchers who used it for recruitment. RESULTS: After 36 months of operation, 58% of patients approached have consented to be in the Registry (N=1256). Eighty-seven percent of those later identified as potential subjects for research studies expressed interest, and 63% eventually participated. Researchers reported satisfaction with the recruitment opportunities afforded by the Registry. CONCLUSIONS: The Registry succeeded in identifying eligible patients interested in participating in research studies, while safeguarding their privacy rights. We identify its strengths and limitations and characterize the type of facility that would most profit from adopting this recruitment model.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a consent-based Patient Research Registry designed to improve the quality and efficiency of cognitive rehabilitation research by balancing patients' privacy rights with researchers' need for access to research participants. DESIGN: Description of a protocol for a Patient Research Registry. SETTING: Three rehabilitation hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the 3 participating hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentages of eligible patients with stroke or TBI who consented to be enrolled in the Registry, were subsequently contacted about a study, and ultimately participated in a study. A survey examined satisfaction with the Registry among researchers who used it for recruitment. RESULTS: After 36 months of operation, 58% of patients approached have consented to be in the Registry (N=1256). Eighty-seven percent of those later identified as potential subjects for research studies expressed interest, and 63% eventually participated. Researchers reported satisfaction with the recruitment opportunities afforded by the Registry. CONCLUSIONS: The Registry succeeded in identifying eligible patients interested in participating in research studies, while safeguarding their privacy rights. We identify its strengths and limitations and characterize the type of facility that would most profit from adopting this recruitment model.
Authors: Junghoon Kim; John Whyte; Sunil Patel; Brian Avants; Eduardo Europa; Jiongjiong Wang; John Slattery; James C Gee; H Branch Coslett; John A Detre Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Myrna F Schwartz; Daniel Y Kimberg; Grant M Walker; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Adelyn Brecher; Gary S Dell; H Branch Coslett Journal: Brain Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Myrna F Schwartz; Daniel Y Kimberg; Grant M Walker; Adelyn Brecher; Olufunsho K Faseyitan; Gary S Dell; Daniel Mirman; H Branch Coslett Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel Mirman; Ted J Strauss; Adelyn Brecher; Grant M Walker; Paula Sobel; Gary S Dell; Myrna F Schwartz Journal: Cogn Neuropsychol Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 2.468
Authors: Laura H F Barde; Myrna F Schwartz; Evangelia G Chrysikou; Sharon L Thompson-Schill Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 3.139