Literature DB >> 16181207

Novel weak D types 31 and 32: adsorption-elution-supported D antigen analysis and comparison to prevalent weak D types.

Günther F Körmöczi1, Elisabeth Förstemann, Christian Gabriel, Wolfgang R Mayr, Diether Schönitzer, Christoph Gassner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weak D types are thought to express rather quantitative than qualitative D antigen variants. Distinct type-specific phenotypes and weak D cases with anti-D alloimmunization, however, suggest a variable degree of D antigen alteration. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Variant D types were investigated by use of molecular typing, RHD sequencing, extended serologic D antigen investigations, and flow cytometric D antigen density determination.
RESULTS: Two novel weak D types were discovered, termed weak D type 31 and 32 with single RHD nucleotide substitutions coding for amino acid exchanges in predicted intracellular RhD polypeptide stretches, with antigen densities of approximately 130 and 50 D sites per red blood cell, respectively. Adsorption-elution technique-supported D epitope mapping of these two weak D types, the recently described weak D type 26, and of the most common Central European weak D types (weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1) demonstrated the expression of all tested D epitopes. In contrast, a distinct D epitope loss was detected in weak D type 15 and partial D control samples.
CONCLUSION: All novel and prevalent weak D types expressed all tested D epitopes. Our results indicate that adsorption-elution techniques may be of advantage whenever D epitope loss is suspected in extremely weak D variants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181207     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  11 in total

Review 1.  Molecular genetics and clinical applications for RH.

Authors:  Willy A Flegel
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 1.764

2.  RHD PCR of D-Negative Blood Donors.

Authors:  Franz F Wagner
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Screening and identification of RhD antigen mimic epitopes from a phage display random peptide library for the serodiagnosis of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn.

Authors:  Jiao Wang; Jingjing Song; Shuimei Zhou; Yourong Fu; Jeffrey A Bailey; Changxin Shen
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Prospective Evaluation of a Transfusion Policy of RhD-Positive Red Blood Cells into DEL Patients in China.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Mei Zhu; Bao-Long Wang; Hong Su; Min Wang
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Application of a Multivariant, Caucasian-Specific, Genotyped Donor Panel for Performance Validation of MDmulticard®, ID-System®, and Scangel® RhD/ABO Serotyping.

Authors:  Christoph Gassner; Esther Rainer; Elfriede Pircher; Lydia Markut; Günther F Körmöczi; Christof Jungbauer; Dietmar Wessin; Roswitha Klinghofer; Harald Schennach; Peter Schwind; Diether Schönitzer
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.747

6.  Strategies to identify candidates for D variant genotyping.

Authors:  Xunda Luo; Margaret A Keller; Ian James; Michelle Grant; Shiguang Liu; Kellie Simmons Massey; Andrew Czulewicz; Sandra Nance; Yanhua Li
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 7.  Responder individuality in red blood cell alloimmunization.

Authors:  Günther F Körmöczi; Wolfgang R Mayr
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.747

8.  D category IV: a group of clinically relevant and phylogenetically diverse partial D.

Authors:  Inge von Zabern; Franz F Wagner; Joann M Moulds; John J Moulds; Willy A Flegel
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Two distinct RHCE alleles in cis to weak D type 31 alleles in individuals from different ethnicities.

Authors:  Kshitij Srivastava; Günther F Körmöczi; Sanmukh R Joshi; Willy A Flegel
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Somatic mosaicisms of chromosome 1 at two different stages of ontogenetic development detected by Rh blood group discrepancies.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Dauber; Wolfgang R Mayr; Hein Hustinx; Marlies Schönbacher; Holger Budde; Tobias J Legler; Margit König; Oskar A Haas; Gerhard Fritsch; Günther F Körmöczi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.